<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] 20 Nov Council call - staff response to Afilias RSEP question
- To: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, GNSO Council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] 20 Nov Council call - staff response to Afilias RSEP question
- From: Liz Gasster <liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 9 Dec 2008 10:47:04 -0800
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AclaLoeRWsTZFAp8QX67hj7nThkGDg==
- Thread-topic: 20 Nov Council call - staff response to Afilias RSEP question
Kristina and all,
At the last GNSO Council meeting, during the discussion on the issues report on
registration abuse provisions, Kristina Rosette asked whether Afilias was
required to use the Registry Services Evaluation Process (RSEP) to implement
their anti-abuse policy or whether Afilias could have implemented it
unilaterally. Following is staff's response to that question:
Afilias contacted ICANN about their proposed anti-abuse policy and following a
review of the RSEP and their Registry Agreement, ICANN staff determined that
the proposed anti-abuse policy did not require a modification to the
Registry-Registrar Agreement (RRA) which is part of the Registry Agreement. It
should be noted, however, that the RSEP is required for all registry services
as defined in the Registry Agreement. It is also worth noting that Afilias
implemented their Abusive Use Policy pursuant to section 3.5.2 of their
Registry-Registrar Agreement
<http://www.icann.org/en/tlds/agreements/info/appendix-08-08dec06.htm>, which
allows Afilias to require registrars to comply with: "operational standards,
policies, procedures, and practices for the Registry TLD established from time
to time by Afilias in a non-arbitrary manner and applicable to all registrars,
including affiliates of Afilias, and consistent with ICANN's standards,
policies, procedures, and practices and Afilias' Registry Agreement with ICANN."
Please let us know if you have further questions.
Thanks, Liz
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|