<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] RE: Motion re. New gTLD Communications Period
- To: "Adrian Kinderis" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] RE: Motion re. New gTLD Communications Period
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 22 Nov 2008 09:42:56 -0500
- In-reply-to: <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB0636EC064C@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07027CBC32@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <8CEF048B9EC83748B1517DC64EA130FB0636EC064C@off-win2003-01.ausregistrygroup.local>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AclMN17eOZZVVzl0TEOb+z50iCxh0wAAjRDAAB2ZkJA=
- Thread-topic: Motion re. New gTLD Communications Period
Adrian,
I think your amendment would be a material change to the intent of
Implementation Guideline E.
I need to be careful about citing names because it was a long time ago, but I
believe one of the proponents of the communications period was one of your
Registrar Constituency colleagues: Werner Staub. So I suggest you talk to him.
In fairness to Werner though, the rest of us thought that it was a reasonable
thing to do. And I still believe that the intent is good. But I believe that
the intent can be accomplished with modifications like I included in my motion.
Chuck
________________________________
From: Adrian Kinderis [mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 9:59 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Subject: RE: Motion re. New gTLD Communications Period
Thanks Chuck.
Whilst we have opened Pandora's box, let me peek in...
Why 4 months at all? Which Communications and Media expert within the
GNSO Council suggested that 4 months would be an appropriate amount of time to
run a Global Communications Campaign?
I would have thought we'd look to limit the maximum amount of time not
dictate the amount of time required. The advice may be that only a month is
required...?
Can I suggest a friendly amendment?
Perhaps it could read as follows (changes marked up in red);
Whereas:
· Implementation Guideline E states, "The application submission
date will be at least four months after the issue of the Request for Proposal
and ICANN will promote the opening of the application round." (See Final
Report, Part A, Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains, dated 8 August
2007 at
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/pdp-dec05-fr-parta-08aug07.htm#_Toc43798015
)
* The intent of the GNSO with regard to Guideline E was to
attempt to ensure that all potential applicants, including those that have not
been active in recent ICANN activities regarding the introduction of new gTLDs,
would be informed of the process and have reasonable time to prepare a proposal
if they so desire.
* The minimum 4-month period for promoting the opening of the
application round is commonly referred to as the 'Communications Period'.
* Considerable delays have been incurred in the implementation of
new gTLDs and the GNSO wishes to minimize any further delays.
* It appears evident that a second Draft Applicant Guidebook
(RFP) will be posted at some time after the end of the two 45-day public
comment periods related to the initial version of the Guidebook (in English and
other languages).
Resolve:
· The GNSO Council changes Implementation Guideline E to the
following:
o ICANN will initiate the Communications Period at the same time
that the second Draft Applicant Guidebook is posted for public comment.
o The opening of the initial application round will occur no
earlier later than four (4) months after the start of the Communications Period
and no earlier than 30 days after the posting of the final Applicant Guidebook
(RFP).
o The actual duration of the Communications Period will be
determined by ICANN staff and appropriate Media and Strategic Consultancy (but
shall not exceed four (4) months).
o As applicable, promotions for the opening of the initial
application round will include:
§ Announcement about the public comment period following the
posting of the second Draft Applicant Guidebook (RFP)
§ Information about the steps that will follow the comment
period including approval and posting of the final Applicant Guidebook (RFP)
§ Estimates of when the initial application round will begin.
Adrian Kinderis
Managing Director
AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Web: www.ausregistrygroup.com
<http://www.ausregistryinternational.com/>
The information contained in this communication is intended for the
named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally
privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended
recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on
it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies
from your system and notify us immediately.
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Saturday, 22 November 2008 11:15 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Motion re. New gTLD Communications Period
I would like to make the following motion (also attached as a Word
file) for consideration at our next Council meeting.
Chuck Gomes
Whereas:
· Implementation Guideline E states, "The application submission
date will be at least four months after the issue of the Request for Proposal
and ICANN will promote the opening of the application round." (See Final
Report, Part A, Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains, dated 8 August
2007 at
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/pdp-dec05-fr-parta-08aug07.htm#_Toc43798015
)
* The intent of the GNSO with regard to Guideline E was to
attempt to ensure that all potential applicants, including those that have not
been active in recent ICANN activities regarding the introduction of new gTLDs,
would be informed of the process and have reasonable time to prepare a proposal
if they so desire.
* The minimum 4-month period for promoting the opening of the
application round is commonly referred to as the 'Communications Period'.
* Considerable delays have been incurred in the implementation of
new gTLDs and the GNSO wishes to minimize any further delays.
* It appears evident that a second Draft Applicant Guidebook
(RFP) will be posted at some time after the end of the two 45-day public
comment periods related to the initial version of the Guidebook (in English and
other languages).
Resolve:
· The GNSO Council changes Implementation Guideline E to the
following:
o ICANN will initiate the Communications Period at the same time
that the second Draft Applicant Guidebook is posted for public comment.
o The opening of the initial application round will occur no
earlier than four (4) months after the start of the Communications Period and
no earlier than 30 days after the posting of the final Applicant Guidebook
(RFP).
o As applicable, promotions for the opening of the initial
application round will include:
§ Announcement about the public comment period following the
posting of the second Draft Applicant Guidebook (RFP)
§ Information about the steps that will follow the comment
period including approval and posting of the final Applicant Guidebook (RFP)
§ Estimates of when the initial application round will begin.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|