<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Motion re. New gTLD Communications Period
- To: Stéphane Van Gelder <stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Motion re. New gTLD Communications Period
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2008 19:34:12 -0500
- In-reply-to: <002701c94c39$6f7cb360$4e761a20$@vangelder@indom.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <046F43A8D79C794FA4733814869CDF07027CBC32@dul1wnexmb01.vcorp.ad.vrsn.com> <002701c94c39$6f7cb360$4e761a20$@vangelder@indom.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AclMN17eOZZVVzl0TEOb+z50iCxh0wAATEtQAABJ/PA=
- Thread-topic: [council] Motion re. New gTLD Communications Period
Stéphane
I am not sure that have any control over that, but I would consider it a
friendly amendment if you proposed a change in that regard. If you do that, I
suggest you request 'best efforts to post the 2nd draft at least two weeks
before the Mexico City meeting".
Chuck
________________________________
From: Stéphane Van Gelder [mailto:stephane.vangelder@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 7:30 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; 'Council GNSO'
Subject: RE: [council] Motion re. New gTLD Communications Period
Chuck,
If your motion aims to ensure there are no excessive delays due to the
4 months communications period, then it should be more specific about when the
second draft of the applicant guidebook is to be published. Otherwise delays in
the second draft's publication will still lead to delays in starting the first
application round and the aim of your motion will be defeated.
As far as I know, staff aims to have the second draft out a couple of
weeks before the Mexico meeting. If that's the case, then adding something
like: "the second Draft Applicant Guidebook is posted for public comment will
be posted for comment at least a week before the first international meeting of
2009" would do the trick.
Stéphane Van Gelder
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: samedi 22 novembre 2008 01:15
To: Council GNSO
Subject: [council] Motion re. New gTLD Communications Period
I would like to make the following motion (also attached as a Word
file) for consideration at our next Council meeting.
Chuck Gomes
Whereas:
· Implementation Guideline E states, "The application submission
date will be at least four months after the issue of the Request for Proposal
and ICANN will promote the opening of the application round." (See Final
Report, Part A, Introduction of New Generic Top-Level Domains, dated 8 August
2007 at
http://gnso.icann.org/issues/new-gtlds/pdp-dec05-fr-parta-08aug07.htm#_Toc43798015
)
* The intent of the GNSO with regard to Guideline E was to
attempt to ensure that all potential applicants, including those that have not
been active in recent ICANN activities regarding the introduction of new gTLDs,
would be informed of the process and have reasonable time to prepare a proposal
if they so desire.
* The minimum 4-month period for promoting the opening of the
application round is commonly referred to as the 'Communications Period'.
* Considerable delays have been incurred in the implementation of
new gTLDs and the GNSO wishes to minimize any further delays.
* It appears evident that a second Draft Applicant Guidebook
(RFP) will be posted at some time after the end of the two 45-day public
comment periods related to the initial version of the Guidebook (in English and
other languages).
Resolve:
· The GNSO Council changes Implementation Guideline E to the
following:
o ICANN will initiate the Communications Period at the same time
that the second Draft Applicant Guidebook is posted for public comment.
o The opening of the initial application round will occur no
earlier than four (4) months after the start of the Communications Period and
no earlier than 30 days after the posting of the final Applicant Guidebook
(RFP).
o As applicable, promotions for the opening of the initial
application round will include:
§ Announcement about the public comment period following the
posting of the second Draft Applicant Guidebook (RFP)
§ Information about the steps that will follow the comment
period including approval and posting of the final Applicant Guidebook (RFP)
§ Estimates of when the initial application round will begin.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|