<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Feedback on Open Joint Sessions in Cairo
Hi,
The Thursday GNSO meeting came up with some concrete proposals that I
passed on to the other chairs.
In essence the GNSO suggestions have been accepted:
Format for first meeting
- a round table format with constituency and region representatives
(each of the ACSOs figures out its own mix). How this is done remains
to be discussed.
- 3 important bullets on the topic(s) from each of the ACSOs published
before the meeting
- Ranking of the priority of the topic(s) within the ACSO is also
published
Same sort of schedule
- first meeting at the beginning of the week to share opinions
- second meeting at the end to share feedback (this one might still
invovle chairs) we did nt discuss it.
Topic has not been set yet. Various sub-themes from 'fees' was used
as an example during the meeting.
So we essentially did as you recommended already, although if there is
more to say, or if I missed the point, we can certainly go further.
In that case I wold recommend a drafting team approach, with those who
want to flesh the idea out further producing a proposal for the
Council to consider.
a.
On 11 Nov 2008, at 18:10, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
I wonder if we should take the initiate to develop a proposal for an
improved format for Mexico City?
Chuck
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
] On Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2008 10:32 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Feedback on Open Joint Sessions in Cairo
I wanted to provide some feedback on the open joint sessions.
Positive points
- it happened
- it addressed genuine cross SO/AC issues
Negative points
- many issues were ill suited to a single SO/AC view and so the
chair was unable to provide input
- the event was a bit lack lustre because of this overly strong
focus on the chairs
- I did not agree with the populist proposal to have every SO under
the sun here just because they exist. The event was intended to
foster understanding on joint issues not be a platform for every SO/
AC.
Proposal
Imagine a large empty room with one large round table with the full
leadership of each organisation sitting ie the GNSO Council, CC
council, the ALAC, the GAC leadership etc. It would be a big table -
maybe three tiered in the style of UN security council with one
lead. But it would be exciting if THIS group had answered the
questions. Observers would sit around the group in outer circles,
interacting as usual.
Philip
PS Glen would you be so kind as to forward this to Patrick Sharry
also ?
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|