ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Motion re Extension of Public Comment Periods


Thanks Kristina, Chuck and Carlos for the comments with which I agree.  Here
is v.3 of the suggested resolution language:

RESOLVED:

 The GNSO Council strongly urges ICANN Staff to extend, for seven days, any
public comment periods which overlap with any of the seven days of an ICANN
meeting.

 

  _____  

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Carlos Affonso Pereira de Souza
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 12:10 AM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Motion re Extension of Public Comment Periods

 

Agreed. Thats why we could work with "suspend" as to indicate that as soon
as the meeting starts the clock stops running for comment periods.



2008/11/5 Gomes, Chuck <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

I am not sure we should restrict it to only comment periods that would end
during an ICANN meeting.  It seems to me that any comment period that
overlaps an ICANN meeting should be extended.

 

Chuck

 


  _____  


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh

Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 2:48 AM
To: 'GNSO Council'
Subject: RE: [council] Motion re Extension of Public Comment Periods

Thanks all for considering this late-breaking motion.  Here is an amended
version of the "Resolved" paragraph -- to clarify 'extension' vs.
'suspension.

 

RESOLVED:

 

The GNSO Council strongly urges ICANN Staff to extend, for seven days, any
public comment periods which would otherwise end during the seven days of an
ICANN meeting.

 

 

 


  _____  


From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2008 10:46 PM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: [council] Motion re Suspension of Public Comment Periods

 

Hi all:  several Councilors would like to introduce and pass this motion
today, whilst we have several different, significant and ongoing public
comment periods.  Therefore I make the motion.

 

Whereas, ICANN's meetings require the full attention of GNSO Councilors and
many other GNSO participants.

 

Whereas, ICANN has many ongoing public comment periods of significant
interest to many GNSO Councilors and participants.

 

Whereas, ICANN's typical comment periods are already difficult for many
members of the ICANN community, particularly those that must consult with
members of their Constituency and/or member organization(s).

 

RESOLVED:

 

The GNSO Council strongly urges ICANN Staff to extend all public comment
periods which would otherwise end during an ICANN meeting, for seven days.

 

Mike Rodenbaugh

Rodenbaugh Law

PO Box 7775 #55819

San Francisco, CA  94120

+1.415.254.4590

 

 



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>