ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Proposed motion on an amendement regarding the outcome of the PDP on clarification of Transfer Denial Reasons

  • To: "Olof Nordling" <olof.nordling@xxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Proposed motion on an amendement regarding the outcome of the PDP on clarification of Transfer Denial Reasons
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 12:32:02 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D788D7578079@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <05B243F724B2284986522B6ACD0504D788D7578079@EXVPMBX100-1.exc.icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AckuGJEMwe2htiNFR5eUQ5y0AJYzAQAAchDQ
  • Thread-topic: [council] Proposed motion on an amendement regarding the outcome of the PDP on clarification of Transfer Denial Reasons

Thanks Olof.  Looks good to me.
 
Chuck


________________________________

        From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Olof Nordling
        Sent: Tuesday, October 14, 2008 12:19 PM
        To: Council GNSO
        Subject: [council] Proposed motion on an amendement regarding
the outcome of the PDP on clarification of Transfer Denial Reasons
        
        

        Dear all,

        Following the public comments regarding the new proposed texts
for transfer denial reasons #8 and #9 and the subsequent discussion on
this list, Chuck asked me to draft a motion for an amendment on this,
for consideration on the call 16 October.

        Please find the draft motion below - it is also on the wiki.

        Very best regards

        Olof

        ---------------------- 

         

        Motion on Amendment to Council Resolution on the Inter-Registrar
Transfer Policy (IRTP) Denial Definitions Policy Development Process
(PDP)

        Moved: Chuck Gomes

        Seconded: 

         

        Whereas:

         

        *         On 4 September 2008, the GNSO Council adopted a
Recommendation concluding a Policy Development Process (PDP) to clarify
four of the nine transfer denial reasons enumerated in the
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy;

         

        *         The ensuing public comment period rendered a comment
identifying a possibility to misinterpret a part of the proposed text
for Denial Reason #9, notably the words "or transfer to the Registrar of
Record"; 

         

        *         The GNSO Council, in consultation with members of the
drafting group for this PDP, has found it appropriate to delete these
words from the proposed text for Denial Reason #9;

         

         

        Resolved:

         

        1. That Denial reason #9 in which the current text reads:

         

        A domain name is within 60 days (or a lesser period to be
determined) after being transferred (apart from being transferred back
to the original Registrar in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or
where a decision in the dispute resolution process so directs).

         

        Be amended to read:

         

        A domain name is within 60 days (or a lesser period to be
determined) after being transferred (apart from being transferred back
to the original Registrar in cases where both Registrars so agree and/or
where a decision in the dispute resolution process so directs).
"Transferred" shall only mean that an inter-registrar transfer has
occurred in accordance with the procedures of this policy.

         

         



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>