<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Improving Institutional Confidence Consultation Enters Second Comment Period
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Improving Institutional Confidence Consultation Enters Second Comment Period
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2008 11:34:53 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AckedDxHaZ+8lw9ERQmbEIGdv8UWsA==
- Thread-topic: Improving Institutional Confidence Consultation Enters Second Comment Period
[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org]
Improving Institutional Confidence Consultation Enters Second Comment Period
19 September 2008
The Improving Institutional Confidence (IIC) in ICANN consultation has entered
a second public comment period that will run until Monday 20 October 2008.
In an effort to progress the consultation, an interactive forum has been set up
that focuses comments and discussion on the individuals points and suggestions
included in the revised documents. Please visit that forum at
http://comment.icann.org/content/iic/. Alternatively, we have set up email
addresses for each of the five main areas. Emails sent to each will appear in a
specific "emailed comments" folder within this area's folder on the discussion
forum (see below for more details).
As part of the ongoing consultation process, and following comments received so
far in the process, the IIC documents initially released in June have been
revised.
The latest versions of the consultation documents are:
Transition Action Plan
Improving Institutional Confidence in ICANN
A Frequently Asked Questions document is also available.
Changes made to the document Improving Institutional Confidence include:
The inclusion of "Suggestions" into the text at relevant points, reflecting
comments and advice received so far. They include: the provision of public
statements of interest; voting restrictions; Board review mechanisms; more
detailed information on a no-confidence vote in the Board; and more information
on the question of "legal presences"
Greater information and clarity on the issue of legal presences
Reference added to operational areas of ICANN's work (such as compliance)
The addition of a discussion of operational efficiency measures under the IANA
procurement agreement with the United States Department of Commerce
Inclusion of text about greater participation within ICANN processes
Other changes:
A number of changes have also been to the Transition Action Plan, including:
A footnote covering the phrase "private sector led", as requested by respondents
An adjustment to the consultation timeline (comment period extended to 20
October)
Other feedback
During the course of the first comment period, a number of suggested additions
were made to the IIC consultation areas. The majority of those additions
concerned ongoing ICANN activities such as: review and reform of existing
supporting organisations and advisory committees; policy development work on
IDNs, new gTLDs, DNSSEC and others; and operational matters such as contractual
compliance. Those matters will continue to be addressed through ICANN's usual
policy development and public comment processes.
The process from here
The body charged with leading the Improving Institutional Confidence (IIC)
consultation, the President's Strategy Committee (PSC), will continue to
receive comment on the key areas outlined in the document at a series of
regional consultative consultations.
Summaries of those meetings, in additional to comment made in the first comment
period, and the feedback received during this second comment period, will then
be used to make changes to the documents in time for a special IIC session at
ICANN's international public meeting in Cairo on 2-7 November.
Full details of the regional meetings can be found at:
http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/regional-meetings.htm. For those seeking more
information on the consultation process, including published comment summaries,
and the IIC documents under discussion, please visit the IIC's dedicated
webpages at http://icann.org/en/jpa/iic. If you wish to be kept informed of the
latest developments, please sign up to the dedicated IIC newsletter at:
http://www.icann.org/en/jpa/iic/iic-newsletter.htm.
The public comment forum
Full links to the different discussion areas, including email addresses are
given below:
Capture [email] | Accountability [email] | Globalization [email] | Finances
[email] | Security and Stability [email]
Background:
More than two years ago, the President's Strategy Committee (PSC) commenced a
series of consultations on how to strengthen and complete the ICANN
multi-stakeholder model. In addition, the recent Midterm Review of the Joint
Project Agreement (JPA) between the United States Department of Commerce and
ICANN produced useful comments about ICANN's performance and future. Most
commentators in that consultation believe ICANN has made significant progress,
but that some key areas need to be improved in order to complete the transition
to an agreed model of multi-stakeholder coordination of the Internet's unique
identifiers.
The PSC has developed three papers that outline those key areas and possible
responses to address them. The PSC wants to be clear - all these suggestions
are for discussion. They are the work of the Committee alone. They are not
fixed positions. But they are also positions that are the result of long-term
work over two years by the PSC that also incorporate recent input from the
community.
The PSC has provided the following three documents to launch a discussion with
the community PSC about how to complete the transition of the organization
after the conclusion of the Joint Project Agreement.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|