<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Revised Community Travel Support Procedure
- To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Revised Community Travel Support Procedure
- From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 15:21:44 +0200
- In-reply-to: <001f01c8fe0e$f9734ee0$0202fea9@united.domain>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <32535.4590.qm@web38806.mail.mud.yahoo.com> <001f01c8fe0e$f9734ee0$0202fea9@united.domain>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acj+DnB4le8mRHZ7Qwa9JCIXThbX4gAAE4XAAABs6SA=
I can see a strong case for the total travel budget being made available to all
those
council members that do not belong to the contracted parties.
Take it we all agree to this ?
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|