ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] GNSO Council Comments in IDNC WG Final Report

  • To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] GNSO Council Comments in IDNC WG Final Report
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:46:35 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <65637ADB-DD51-4F76-A9B8-3653361B8B08@psg.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <01de01c8fd30$6e0aacb0$4a200610$@org> <65637ADB-DD51-4F76-A9B8-3653361B8B08@psg.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Acj9OXiKbhDKV5oDTMSacY+tTdiqvwAET/8g
  • Thread-topic: [council] GNSO Council Comments in IDNC WG Final Report

Sounds good Avri.  Thanks Edmon for all the work on this.

I like the last paragraph although I wonder whether the point about cost
recovery will be picked up.  At the same time I support sending this
report in.

Chuck 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 7:38 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Fwd: [council] GNSO Council Comments in IDNC WG Final Report
> 
> Hi,
> 
> The document that is attached is the version Edmon just sent 
> out with all edits accepted.
> 
> As the deadline is the Friday 15 Aug, I intend to send this 
> in before that deadline if there are not objection in the 
> Council to its content as was discussed at our last meeting.
> 
> Please let the Council list know of any objections with 24 
> hours of this note (by 1200 UTC 14 August).  If I have not 
> received any objections by that time, I will submit the 
> document as the GNSO council response.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> 
> a.
> 
> 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>