<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] GNSO Council Comments in IDNC WG Final Report
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] GNSO Council Comments in IDNC WG Final Report
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2008 09:46:35 -0400
- In-reply-to: <65637ADB-DD51-4F76-A9B8-3653361B8B08@psg.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <01de01c8fd30$6e0aacb0$4a200610$@org> <65637ADB-DD51-4F76-A9B8-3653361B8B08@psg.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acj9OXiKbhDKV5oDTMSacY+tTdiqvwAET/8g
- Thread-topic: [council] GNSO Council Comments in IDNC WG Final Report
Sounds good Avri. Thanks Edmon for all the work on this.
I like the last paragraph although I wonder whether the point about cost
recovery will be picked up. At the same time I support sending this
report in.
Chuck
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 7:38 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Fwd: [council] GNSO Council Comments in IDNC WG Final Report
>
> Hi,
>
> The document that is attached is the version Edmon just sent
> out with all edits accepted.
>
> As the deadline is the Friday 15 Aug, I intend to send this
> in before that deadline if there are not objection in the
> Council to its content as was discussed at our last meeting.
>
> Please let the Council list know of any objections with 24
> hours of this note (by 1200 UTC 14 August). If I have not
> received any objections by that time, I will submit the
> document as the GNSO council response.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> a.
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|