[council] Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy - Denial of Transfers (Reasons #8 and #9)
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy - Denial of Transfers (Reasons #8 and #9)
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2008 09:15:07 -0700
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcjhFcmjSxtLkkzhQCShk0cl2tiDZw==
- Thread-topic: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy - Denial of Transfers (Reasons #8 and #9)
[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
Reminder to submit public comments before 18 July 2008.
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy - Denial of Transfers (Reasons #8 and #9)
Explanation: As part of its ongoing efforts to review the Inter-Registrar
Transfer Policy (the rules for transfer of domain names between registrars) the
GNSO Council seeks community review and comment on two proposed revisions to
the IRTP regarding reasons for which a registrar of record may deny a request
to transfer a domain name to a new registrar. The two revisions being
considered by the Council are referred to as Reason # 8 and Reason # 9. They
are part of a larger policy development process (PDP) that has involved a
subset of four reasons (Reason # 5 and # 7 in addition to # 8 and # 9) for
which a registrar could deny a transfer request.
The overall IRTP review has become a considerable undertaking that could
ultimately span as many as six separate policy development processes. A review
of the current PDP involving Reasons # 8 and # 9 is set forth in the
announcement for this comment forum.
On 17 April 2008, the GNSO Council launched a drafting group to develop
suggested text modifications for Reasons 5, 7, 8 and 9. The drafting group
delivered a Final Draft Report [PDF, 48K] dated 4 June 2008, proposing new
textual language for reasons 8 and 9, while suggesting that denial reasons 5
and 7 be considered within a separate proposed PDP or a future PDP that offers
a stronger linkage with those issues.
The Council agreed with the recommendations of the drafting group. It directed
the staff to post the proposed new text for Reasons # 8 and # 9 for
constituency and public comments
Glen de Saint Géry and report back to the Council with a summary of the
You can read the recommendations regarding Reasons # 8 and # 9 with the
proposed new language here:
Comments on the document are welcome through 18 July 2008.