ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] GNSO reform - IPC rep

  • To: "Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] GNSO reform - IPC rep
  • From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 08:57:27 -0700
  • Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: fr-FR, en-US
  • Cc: "met@xxxxxxx" <met@xxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <3BA081BEFB35144DBD44B2F141C2C72704FDE7E1@cbiexm04dc.cov.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <3BA081BEFB35144DBD44B2F141C2C72704FDE7E1@cbiexm04dc.cov.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcjWtXF2g0jcSJiGSPy/AdvMWgXT5gAI2zjQAFR1pXAAOLT9uAA80BXQ
  • Thread-topic: [council] GNSO reform - IPC rep

Thanks Kristina noted and added to the list

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: samedi 28 juin 2008 12:56
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: met@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] GNSO reform - IPC rep


Steve Metalitz will represent the IPC on the group.


Kristina Rosette
Covington & Burling LLP
1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, DC  20004-2401
voice:  202-662-5173
direct fax:  202-778-5173
main fax:  202-662-6291
e-mail:  krosette@xxxxxxx

This message is from a law firm and may contain information that is 
confidential or legally privileged.  If you are not the intended recipient, 
please immediately advise the sender by reply e-mail that this message has been 
inadvertently transmitted to you and delete this e-mail from your system.  
Thank you for your cooperation.

Sent from my Wireless Handheld

----- Original Message -----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Fri Jun 27 04:04:11 2008
Subject: [council] GNSO reform - need to set up the schedule NOW !

Fellow Councillors,
the Board has spoken and as any Board does when faced with intractable issues, 
it has sent
then back to the intractable participants to sort out !
I exaggerate, the Board has given us a 4 week window to seek a compromise 
ourselves and I
find that positive.

I especially welcomed those Board members who commented that working on 
principles and
objectives first is more important than the tool to implement those principles 
such as
parity or the number of votes.

I believe we should start our WG discussions looking at options which meet the 
concerns of
all parties, and then work out the best tools to meet them.

Avri, Glen - we need to move rapidly on this group and have its first 
teleconference meeting
next week  w/c June 30 - perhaps July 2 at 1500 UTC with weekly calls or more 
I suggest also a face to face of the small WG could be useful towards its 
completion stage -
perhaps in ICANN Brussels (or an Amsterdam Airport hotel) weekend of 12-13 July 
Sorry to be presumptuous on dates but the timetable is very tight.

I will be the BC representative.
Who are the other members?


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>