RE: [council] finalizing motions in advance of voting on them
Couldn't this paralize us? I agree if there is a material change where
we need to go back to our constituencies.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2008 6:46 AM
> To: Robin Gross
> Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] finalizing motions in advance of voting on them
> I fully support this call
> > I'd to request that whatever motions are up for counsel vote are
> > finalized at least several days in advance of voting on
> them, meaning
> > no last minute amendments - friendly or not.
> > I'm concerned about the tendency to amend the motion during
> the public
> > counsel meeting and we end up wasting GNSO public forum
> time crafting
> > language on the fly (and this does not instill confidence in the
> > counsel from the community).
> > Besides appearing silly, and more importantly, last minute
> > do not give us a chance to discuss the motion that will be voted on
> > with our constituencies. It is important that we know exactly what
> > will be voted on in advance so we can get key feedback from our
> > constituencies.
> > Thanks,
> > Robin
> > IP JUSTICE
> > Robin Gross, Executive Director
> > 1192 Haight Street, San Francisco, CA 94117 USA
> > p: +1-415-553-6261 f: +1-415-462-6451
> > w: http://www.ipjustice.org e: robin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx