RE: [council] RyC Confusingly Similar Statement

["Adrian Kinderis" <adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

No problems Chuck.

 

I was hoping your Constituency may have been able to assist you in the 
response. It didn't necessarily have to come from you...

 

Once again, sorry for pushing the point and I hope the words "send him to the 
chair" weren't part of your deliberations (on the jury anyway...) J

 

Regards,

 

Adrian Kinderis
Managing Director

AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Web: www.ausregistrygroup.com <http://www.ausregistryinternational.com/> 

 

The information contained in this communication is intended for the named 
recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged 
and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must 
not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have 
received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system 
and notify us immediately.

 

From: Gomes, Chuck [mailto:cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, 18 April 2008 9:35 AM
To: Adrian Kinderis; Council GNSO
Cc: Maher, David
Subject: RE: [council] RyC Confusingly Similar Statement

 

Yes.  I just finished 3 weeks of jury duty yesterday and am now trying hard to 
catch up.

 

Chuck

 

________________________________

From: Adrian Kinderis [mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2008 7:22 PM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Cc: Maher, David
Subject: RE: [council] RyC Confusingly Similar Statement

Chuck,

 

Can we expect to see a response to my clarification email any time soon?

 

Sorry to be a pest...

 

Adrian Kinderis
Managing Director

AusRegistry Group Pty Ltd
Level 8, 10 Queens Road
Melbourne. Victoria Australia. 3004
Ph: +61 3 9866 3710
Fax: +61 3 9866 1970
Email: adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:adrian@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
Web: www.ausregistrygroup.com <http://www.ausregistryinternational.com/> 

 

The information contained in this communication is intended for the named 
recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged 
and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must 
not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have 
received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system 
and notify us immediately.

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Friday, 18 April 2008 8:11 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Council GNSO
Cc: David W. Maher
Subject: RE: [council] RyC Confusingly Similar Statement

 

We have learned, to our embarrassment, that one paragraph of the RyC 
Confusingly Similar Statement I distributed to the Council list on 10 April is 
incorrect. 
The paragraph that reads, "For example, assume that different registry 
operators were approved for .Munich and .München. If a cybersquatter registered 
 the domain names XYZ.Munich and XYZ.München, then the owner of the trademark 
XYZ would have to file two separate complaints under the Uniform Dispute 
Resolution Policy (UDRP).  Also, the implementation of a panel decision against 
the cybersquatter would need to involve both registries, but, if both gTLDs 
were registered with the same registry, that complication could be avoided." 
should be deleted (or ignored) since it does not accurately reflect the 
procedural rules of the URDP.

 

Thanks to Mike Rodenbaugh for pointing this error out.

 

Chuck

 

________________________________

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2008 10:31 AM
To: Council GNSO
Cc: Maher, David
Subject: [council] RyC Confusingly Similar Statement

Here's a statement developed by the RyC regarding New gTLD Recommendation 2, 
hopefully providing some new thoughts in that regard.

 

Chuck