RE: [council] Fast Flux Hosting

[Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Set aside I suppose, but safely? Is it safe, or wise, to ignore the
repeated advice we have gotten, prior to the request for the issues
report and now in the issues report itself, that further study and
research is needed?
 
 
Tim 


-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [council] Fast Flux Hosting
From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, April 11, 2008 6:34 am
To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>



Tim Ruiz wrote:
"we are guaranteeing that we won't stay within the PDP timeline"

The Board governance committee wrote:
"Review of PDPs that have been undertaken suggests that it is not
practical to complete
policy work in the timeframes contained in the PDP"

The LSE wrote:
"it is desirable for more realistic timings for PDP phases to be
formulated".

Tim your concerns are well known and can be safely set aside.

Philip