<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Board's postion on ALAC letter on "front-running"
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Board's postion on ALAC letter on "front-running"
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 5 Apr 2008 09:46:08 +0200
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
I have put this on the list of topic for our next agenda. It might be
worth having some preliminary discussions on list.
References:
- ALAC letter: <http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04857.html
>
- Discussion under 11 Other business: <http://www.icann.org/minutes/prelim-report-27mar08.htm
> Board's Disposition: "The Chair determined that emergency action
is not required today but the matter will be referred to the GNSO for
additional information or policy development if necessary, but not an
emergency action."
My first questions:
- Do we want/need to request an issues report?
- Do we want to request advice from SSAC on the degree to which this
is a threat to Stability and Security as stated in the ALAC letter.
SAC22 of Oct 07 <http://www.icann.org/committees/security/sac022.pdf>
spoke of it as being possibly contrary to core values but I do not
read their report as calling it a threat. Though the report does seem
to indicate that further investigation of issues surrounding the
practice could be investigated further.
thanks
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|