<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] ICANN Issues Advisory Regarding the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy
- To: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] ICANN Issues Advisory Regarding the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy
- From: "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 03 Apr 2008 23:18:17 +0200
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 (Windows/20080213)
[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org]
ICANN
Issues Advisory Regarding the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy
Advisory available at
http://www.icann.org/announcements/advisory-03apr08.htm
Due to perceived confusion within the registrar community concerning the
circumstances under which registrars may validly deny transfer requests
pursuant to the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy, on 19 September 2007,
ICANN issued a Notice of Intent to Issue Advisory Regarding the
Inter-Registrar Transfer
(Notice) http://www.icann.org/announcements/announcement-19sep07.htm.
As part of this Notice, ICANN published a Proposed Advisory Regarding
the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (Proposed Advisory). The purpose of
the Proposed Advisory was to solicit comments regarding whether it was
necessary to publish an advisory to assist ICANN-accredited registrars
in understanding their obligations under the Inter-Registrar Transfer
Policy.
The community was informed that comments would be accepted for 30 days
regarding the Proposed Advisory. ICANN received 16 comments, of which 14
were supportive of ICANN issuing the Proposed Advisory, one comment
opposed the issuance of the Proposed Advisory and one comment was deemed
neutral as it did not indicate support or opposition. After considering
the comments received and other information provided by registrars
regarding the Proposed Advisory, ICANN determined that sufficient
confusion exists to warrant the issuance of an advisory to assist
registrars in understanding that under the Transfer Policy:
1. Registrars are prohibited from denying
a domain name transfer request based on non-payment of fees for pending
or future registration periods during the Auto-Renew Grace Period; and
2. A registrant change to Whois information is not a valid basis for
denying a transfer request.
The Advisory is identical to the Proposed Advisory issued on 19
September 2007, except the term "registration period after expiration"
was replaced with "Auto-Renew Grace Period" wherever it appeared in the
Proposed Advisory.
Developed through ICANN?s consensus policy process, the Transfer Policy
was approved unanimously by ICANN?s Generic Names Supporting Organization
(GNSO) and its Board of Directors. After consultation with several
interested parties, the Transfer Policy was adopted in 2004. The
Transfer Policy provides domain name holders with a standardized process
for transferring their domain names from one ICANN-accredited registrar
to another upon request. All ICANN-accredited registrars and unsponsored
gTLD registry operators are required to comply with the Transfer Policy
pursuant to their agreements with ICANN. The purpose of the Advisory is
to provide clarity and promote consistent handling of transfer requests.
--
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|