[council] RE: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: Summary of public comments on a draft GNSO Council resolution to curb domain tasting

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

That's not an accurate characterization. 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 9:39 AM
To: Avri Doria; gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Council GNSO
Subject: RE: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: Summary of public comments on a draft GNSO
Council resolution to curb domain tasting


Avri,

We discussed these in detail yesterday on our call and believe no
changes are warranted to the motion.

Also FYI, we expect that ICANN staff will announce in the next day or so
that the board approved the proposals by NeuStar and Afilias to modify
the AGP.

Feel free to forward to the council list as I do not have permission.

Jeffrey J. Neuman, Esq. 
Sr. Director, Law, Advanced Services  & 

Business Development 

NeuStar, Inc. 
e-mail: Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx 


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Wednesday, April 02, 2008 9:01 AM
To: gnso-dt-wg@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [gnso-dt-wg] FW: Summary of public comments on a draft GNSO
Council resolution to curb domain tasting


Hi,

I am wondering whether the DT is going to go through all the comments
and include an initial response to them in their report to the council
or whether the council itself  will approach then raw at the council
meeting.  I am fine either way, though I think having the DT do the
first pass a responding to all comments will facilitate the work and
give a better perspective.

I want to make sure that in our deliberations we cover all of the
possibilities and issues mentioned in the public comments, including
those that are not direct comments on the motion before the council or
the proposals before the Registry Services Evaluation Process.  I.e.  
we should discuss not only modification to the AGP but must make sure we
cover in our discussions the proposal to eliminate the AGP.  We also
need to make sure we understand the implications of the current motion
on the proposal before the  Registry Services Evaluation Process and the
Board resolution (2008.01.04) to investigate using ICANN's budgetary
process to control DT through the introduction of fees .


thanks

a.