[council] Discussion Draft of Interim Report of IDNC WG for Public Comments

["GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

[To: council[at]gnso.icann.org; liaison6c[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: ga[at]gnso.icann.org; announce[at]gnso.icann.org]
[To: regional-liaisons[at]icann.org]

Discussion Draft of Interim Report of IDNC WG for Public Comments
Public comments open till 25 April 2008

(31 March 2008)

The Draft Report is available here.
http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idnc-proposed-methodology-31mar08.pdf

This is a first Discussion Draft of the Interim Report of the IDNC 
Working Group (IDNC WG). It is published for comment and input from the 
ICANN community. This document has not been signed-off on by the IDNC 
Working Group whose members will continue to provide their own comments 
and input during this consultation period.
The IDNC WG was charted by ICANN's Board to develop and report on 
feasible methods, if any, that would enable the introduction, in a 
timely manner and in a manner that ensures the continued security and 
stability of the Internet, of a limited number of non-contentious IDN 
ccTLDs, associated with the ISO 3166-1 two-letter codes (both the 
official code list of ISO 3166-1 and the list of reserved ISO 3166-1 
code elements), while the overall IDN ccTLD policy is being developed.
The scope of the IDNC WG is limited to developing feasible methods (for 
the introduction of a limited number of IDN ccTLDs) that do not pre-empt 
the policy outcomes of the IDN cc Policy Development Process (ccPDP) for 
which an Issue Report is currently being prepared.
Under the IDNC WG charter, in considering feasible fast track methods, 
the IDNC WG must take into account and be guided by:
The overarching requirement to preserve the security and stability of 
the DNS;
Compliance with the IDNA protocols;
Input and advice from the technical community in respect to the 
implementation of IDNs;
Current practices for the delegation of ccTLDs.
As indicated in the draft Initial Report the fast track approach 
requires two specific mechanisms which are addressed in this report:
A mechanism for the selection of the IDN ccTLD string (See Section 3 of 
the report); and
A mechanism to designate an IDN ccTLD manager (See Section 4 of the 
report).
The purpose of this report is to inform and report to the community on 
the topics and issues as identified by the IDNC WG that need to be 
considered in developing each of the two mechanisms, and to seek input 
and comments on them. This report, and the comments received, will be 
used to structure and propose potential mechanisms in the next phase of 
the fast track (See Section 5 of the report for the Interim Report 
Schedule). As stated above, the outcome of the fast track cannot 
pre-empt the outcome of the ccPDP. All of the issues/topics raised 
regarding the fast track mechanisms also are being raised under the 
ccPDP. Thus, the solutions reached for the purposes of the fast track, 
out of necessity, have to be as limited as possible.
Comments on this report are encouraged to be submitted by 25 April via 
email to idn-cctld-fast-track@xxxxxxxxx. An archive of all comments 
received will be publicly posted at 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/idn-cctld-fast-track/.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org