<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Upcoming agenda questions:
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Upcoming agenda questions:
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2008 12:36:11 -0400
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
We (Chuck, Glen and I) am in the process of putting together the
agenda for the meeting on the 27th. I have some questions:
- Is someone going to offer a motion regarding electronic voting.
- re the Whois studies discussion - is there need to invite Lorrie
Cranor, the expert who was consulted in preparing the report, to the
meeting. I have been informed that she is available, but we don't
want to waster her time, or ICANN budget, if we don't have any
specific questions for her at this time.
- On March 6 Denise reported that the Board was waiting for the GNSO
and/or CCNSO to submit a followup to our counter-point letters. Is
this something we want to pursue or are we happy with the way things
are going?
Note: As I mentioned briefly at the end of the previous meeting,
the ccNSO has contacted me regarding the Paris meeting with a proposal
that we meet together on Thursday afternoon. I think this is a good
idea. What do others think? One pending issue is whether this is a
council-council meeting, as it was last time, or an SO-SO meeting? As
I understand it, the ccNSO generally meets in full SO mode. If it is
to be a SO-SO meeting, I would like to find a volunteer to work with
the ccNSO volunteer to set this up. I will add this to the agenda,
but wanted to bring up the issue.
thanks.
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|