ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Motions re Domain Tasting

  • To: "'GNSO Council'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Motions re Domain Tasting
  • From: "Philip Sheppard" <philip.sheppard@xxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 09:05:21 +0100
  • In-reply-to: <010d01c87e55$78806720$69813560$@com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <20080304153131.4a871ae7d05d2c98d9abb595d392cd69.59aa131b63.wbe@email.secureserver.net> <010d01c87e55$78806720$69813560$@com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ach+R38W196TSbdjS9aKY1ltQaXPsgAAJaqQABOw6YA=

Mike Rodenbaugh is correct in this matter.
ICANN has already provided legal sanction in the acceptance that the issue is 
within GNSO
competence. This is a by law provision.
Next the GNSO acts as it wishes and makes a recommended policy to the Board. 
Our job is
Then ICANN's board may seek a second legal opinion of that specific policy 
outcome if it

The GNSO is failing in its duty of care to the public in our continued failure 
to act.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>