<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] RE: Tim's response regarding the third amendment
- To: Edmon Chung <edmon@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] RE: Tim's response regarding the third amendment
- From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:32:20 -0700
- Cc: "'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.12.22
<html><body><div>Yes, if we can stick with the original language in this
document and let whatever PDP goes forward deal with the gov't policy issue. I
don't think we need to go there in this document.</div>
<div><BR><BR>Tim Ruiz<BR>Vice President<BR>Corp. Development &
Policy<BR>The Go Daddy Group, Inc.<BR>Direct: 319-329-9804<BR>Fax:
480-247-4516<BR><A href="mailto:tim@xxxxxxxxxxx";>tim@xxxxxxxxxxx</A><BR><BR>How
am I doing? Please contact my direct supervisor at <A
href="mailto:president@xxxxxxxxxxx";>president@xxxxxxxxxxx</A> with any
feedback.<BR><BR>This email message and any attachments hereto is intended for
use only by the addressee(s) named herein and may contain confidential
information. If you have received this email in error, please immediately
notify the sender and permanently delete the original and any copy of this
message and its attachments.<BR><BR><BR></div>
<BLOCKQUOTE style="PADDING-LEFT: 8px; MARGIN-LEFT: 8px; BORDER-LEFT: blue 2px
solid" webmail="1">-------- Original Message --------<BR>Subject: RE: [council]
RE: Tim's response regarding the third amendment<BR>From: "Edmon Chung"
<edmon@xxxxxxxxxxx><BR>Date: Tue, February 12, 2008 10:15 pm<BR>To:
"'Council GNSO'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx><BR><BR><BR>The document in
general is focused on the "PDP" i.e. longer term discussion.<BR>Perhaps we
should focus on your suggestion regarding 1 per in the response <BR>directly to
the IDNC (fast track)? Would you be ok with that?<BR>Edmon<BR><BR><BR>>
-----Original Message-----<BR>> From: <A
onclick="Popup.composeWindow('pcompose.php?sendto=owner-council%40gnso.icann.org');
return false;"
href="https://email.secureserver.net/pcompose.php?aEmlPart=0&type=reply&folder=INBOX&uid=128095#Compose";>owner-council<B></B>@gnso.icann.org</A>
[mailto:<A
onclick="Popup.composeWindow('pcompose.php?sendto=owner-council%40gns!
o.icann.org'); return false;"
href="https://email.secureserver.net/pcompose.php?aEmlPart=0&type=reply&folder=INBOX&uid=128095#Compose";>owner-council<B></B>@gnso.icann.org</A>]
On<BR>> Behalf Of Tim Ruiz<BR>> Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2008 11:56
AM<BR>> To: 'Council GNSO'<BR>> Subject: [council] RE: Tim's response
regarding the third amendment<BR>><BR>><BR>> Perhaps the issue is that
the response needs to clarify between the fast<BR>> track and the issues for
the PDP. For the fast track, one per entry for<BR>> which an IANA delegation
exists, and a different response for the PDP<BR>> input.<BR>><BR>>
Tim<BR>><BR>> -------- Original Message --------<BR>> Subject: Tim's
response regarding the third amendment<BR>> From: Tim Ruiz <<A
onclick="Popup.composeWindow('pcompose.php?sendto=tim%40godaddy.com'); return
false;"
href="https://email.secureserver.net/pcompose.php?aEmlPart=0&type=reply&folder=INBOX&!
;uid=128095#Compose">tim<B></B>@godaddy.com</A>><BR>> Date: Tue,
February 12, 2008 9:48 pm<BR>> To: 'Council GNSO' <<A
onclick="Popup.composeWindow('pcompose.php?sendto=council%40gnso.icann.org');
return false;"
href="https://email.secureserver.net/pcompose.php?aEmlPart=0&type=reply&folder=INBOX&uid=128095#Compose";>council<B></B>@gnso.icann.org</A>><BR>><BR>>
I thought this was supposed to be an interim solution. A fast track
for<BR>> existing ccTLDs. Agreeing to one so-called IDN ccTLD per 3166-1
entry,<BR>> for which an IANA delegation exists, is very generous. Any
others should<BR>> wait for whatever PDP ensues to resolve it
further.<BR>><BR>> Tim<BR><BR><BR><BR></BLOCKQUOTE></body></html>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|