RE: [council] Draft Initial Report for IDNC
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Draft Initial Report for IDNC
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2008 16:17:24 -0500
- In-reply-to: <141AEE71-52F9-464D-9B72-EC38769A223E@psg.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AchlwsOF/gxO1ivnRRqr6HR7klazOwAHiFXg
- Thread-topic: [council] Draft Initial Report for IDNC
I am willing to take a crack at a motion but wonder if I should wait
until after our working session on Sunday in New Delhi?
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 10:39 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Draft Initial Report for IDNC
This should probably be framed into a motion by someone for Wednesday's
On 2 Feb 2008, at 09:37, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> Note that ICANN pusblished the Draft Initial Report for the IDNC for
> public comment:
> A decision we need to consider is whether we want to provide GNSO
> comments on this. In particular, we could provide relevant comments
> from our response to the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper on IDN ccTLDs.
> Because the comment period ends 26 February, we probably should decide
> this in New Delhi when we are talking about this topic.
> On a related note, the public comment period on the Introduction of
> IDN ccTLDs ends on 25 February. We had previously discussed whether
> we should submit our full response to the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper on
> IDN ccTLDs. I personally support this because our response directly
> answers the questions in that issues paper. But we should decide that
> in New Delhi. Certainly, we need to provide our response to the Board
> because they requested it.
> Chuck Gomes
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited.
> If you have received this message in error, please notify sender
> immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."