RE: [council] Draft Initial Report for IDNC

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I am willing to take a crack at a motion but wonder if I should wait
until after our working session on Sunday in New Delhi?

Chuck 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2008 10:39 AM
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Draft Initial Report for IDNC


Hi,

This should probably be framed into a motion by someone for Wednesday's
meeting.

a.

On 2 Feb 2008, at 09:37, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> Note that ICANN pusblished the Draft Initial Report for the IDNC for 
> public comment: 
> http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/draft-initial-report-idnc-wg-01fe
> b08.pdf
>
> A decision we need to consider is whether we want to provide GNSO 
> comments on this.  In particular, we could provide relevant comments
> from our response to the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper on IDN ccTLDs.   
> Because the comment period ends 26 February, we probably should decide

> this in New Delhi when we are talking about this topic.
>
> On a related note, the public comment period on the Introduction of 
> IDN ccTLDs ends on 25 February.  We had previously discussed whether 
> we should submit our full response to the ccNSO/GAC Issues Paper on 
> IDN ccTLDs.  I personally support this because our response directly 
> answers the questions in that issues paper.  But we should decide that

> in New Delhi.  Certainly, we need to provide our response to the Board

> because they requested it.
>
> Chuck Gomes
>
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to 
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,

> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any 
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. 
> If you have received this message in error, please notify sender 
> immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
>