<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Registrars' Statement of Views on Domain Name Tasting
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Registrars' Statement of Views on Domain Name Tasting
- From: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2008 10:08:13 -0700
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Reply-to: Tim Ruiz <tim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Web-Based Email 4.12.22
The attached is the Registrar Constituency statement of views on Domain
Name Tasting.
Tim
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\uc1\deff0\stshfdbch0\stshfloch0\stshfhich0\stshfbi0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\fonttbl{\f0\froman\fcharset0\fprq2{\*\panose
02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f37\froman\fcharset238\fprq2 Times New
Roman CE;}
{\f38\froman\fcharset204\fprq2 Times New Roman
Cyr;}{\f40\froman\fcharset161\fprq2 Times New Roman
Greek;}{\f41\froman\fcharset162\fprq2 Times New Roman
Tur;}{\f42\froman\fcharset177\fprq2 Times New Roman (Hebrew);}
{\f43\froman\fcharset178\fprq2 Times New Roman
(Arabic);}{\f44\froman\fcharset186\fprq2 Times New Roman
Baltic;}{\f45\froman\fcharset163\fprq2 Times New Roman
(Vietnamese);}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;
\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;
\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\ql
\li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \snext0
Normal;}{\*\cs10 \additive \ssemihidden
Default Paragraph
Font;}{\*\ts11\tsrowd\trftsWidthB3\trpaddl108\trpaddr108\trpaddfl3\trpaddft3\trpaddfb3\trpaddfr3\trcbpat1\trcfpat1\tscellwidthfts0\tsvertalt\tsbrdrt\tsbrdrl\tsbrdrb\tsbrdrr\tsbrdrdgl\tsbrdrdgr\tsbrdrh\tsbrdrv
\ql \li0\ri0\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0
\fs20\lang1024\langfe1024\cgrid\langnp1024\langfenp1024 \snext11 \ssemihidden
Normal Table;}{\*\cs15 \additive \ul\cf2 \sbasedon10 \styrsid6107023
Hyperlink;}{
\s16\ql
\li0\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033 \sbasedon0 \snext16
\styrsid6107023 Normal (Web);}}
{\*\latentstyles\lsdstimax156\lsdlockeddef0}{\*\pgptbl
{\pgp\ipgp5\itap0\li0\ri0\sb0\sa0}{\pgp\ipgp0\itap0\li0\ri0\sb0\sa0}{\pgp\ipgp4\itap0\li0\ri0\sb0\sa0}{\pgp\ipgp1\itap0\li2928\ri0\sb720\sa0}{\pgp\ipgp2\itap0\li0\ri0\sb0\sa0}}{\*\rsidtbl
\rsid2248791
\rsid2256934\rsid2635334\rsid4195771\rsid5723255\rsid6107023\rsid6884399\rsid9323760\rsid10703008\rsid12018373\rsid12872523}{\*\generator
Microsoft Word 11.0.6359;}{\info
{\title Registrars Constituency (RC) has not reached Supermajority support for
a particular position on Domain Name Tasting}{\author TRuiz}{\operator
TRuiz}{\creatim\yr2008\mo1\dy26\hr11\min5}{\revtim\yr2008\mo1\dy26\hr11\min5}{\version3}{\edmins1}
{\nofpages2}{\nofwords666}{\nofchars3797}{\*\company Go Daddy
Group}{\nofcharsws4455}{\vern24703}}\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\noxlattoyen\expshrtn\noultrlspc\dntblnsbdb\nospaceforul\hyphcaps0\formshade\horzdoc\dgmargin\dghspace180\dgvspace180\dghorigin1800
\dgvorigin1440\dghshow1\dgvshow1\jexpand\viewkind1\viewscale75\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot\splytwnine\ftnlytwnine\htmautsp\nolnhtadjtbl\useltbaln\alntblind\lytcalctblwd\lyttblrtgr\lnbrkrule\nobrkwrptbl\snaptogridincell\allowfieldendsel\wrppunct
\asianbrkrule\rsidroot6107023\newtblstyruls\nogrowautofit \fet0\sectd
\linex0\endnhere\sectlinegrid360\sectdefaultcl\sftnbj
{\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta
.}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta .}}
{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta
.}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxta
)}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}{\pntxta
)}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb (}
{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb
(}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb
(}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang {\pntxtb
(}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain
\s16\ql
\li0\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6107023
\fs24\lang1033\langfe1033\cgrid\langnp1033\langfenp1033
{\b\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid9323760\charrsid12018373
Registrars Constituency\line January
2}{\b\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid2248791\charrsid12018373
6}{\b\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid9323760\charrsid12018373 , 2008
\par }{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid2635334 The following statement of
views was put to a vote and the Registrar Constituency (RC) approved it by
majority vote. }{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid2256934 Votes were cast by 31
of the RC\rquote
s 65 members, 20 voted in favor, 4 voted against, and 7
abstained.}{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid2635334
\par }{\b\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid5723255\charrsid5723255 Registrar
Constituency Statement of Views on Domain Name
Tasting}{\b\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid5723255
:}{\b\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid5723255\charrsid5723255
\par }{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023 Registrars Constituency (RC)
has not reached Supermajority support for a particular position on Domain Name
Tasting. Below are statements of the views/positions espoused by RC members.
\par }{\b\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023\charrsid6107023 View
1.}{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023 Many registrars believe that
Tasting should be curbed if not eliminated altogether for one or more of the
following reasons:
\par }\pard \s16\ql
\li720\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid6107023
{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023
a. Tasting is causing general confusion among registrants and potential
registrants trying to register domain names.
\par b. Tasting is eroding consumer confidence in the security and
trustworthiness of domain name registration services and our industry in
general.
\par c. Tasting is causing an increase in support costs for Registrars.
\par d. Tasting violates well-established codes of conduct and good practice
intended to ensure security and stability by:
\par }\pard \s16\ql
\li1440\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin1440\itap0\pararsid6107023
{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023
i. disturbing the stability of a set of existing services that had been
functioning satisfactorily, namely the competitive domain name registration
services developed by Registrars;
\par ii. disturbing other existing systems and value added services, for
example those relying on Zone files, and various third party WHOIS services;
\par iii. increasing costs that must be absorbed by others not participating in
or benefiting from Tasting.
\par }\pard \s16\ql
\li720\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid6107023
{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023 e. Despite the long held tenet of
"First do no harm
," there has been no research, testing for potential disruption of existing
services, public review, or comment prior to this high volume activity abruptly
occurring in the DNS.
\par }\pard \s16\ql
\li0\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6107023
{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023 In summary, high volume Tasting
activity has undermined expectations about re
liable behavior and in so doing has reduced trust in the security and stability
of the system and has increased costs for registrars, registrants, and others
not participating in the activity.
\par }{\b\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023\charrsid6107023 View
2.}{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023 Many registrars believe that
Tasting should not be a m
atter of concern or action by the GNSO or ICANN for one or more of the
following reasons:
\par }\pard \s16\ql
\li720\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid6107023
{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023
a. Tasting takes place due to market demand, and the market should be allowed
to evolve as demand dictates.
\par b. ICANN is not a regulatory body, and according to its own bylaws,
coordinates policy development reasonably and appropriately related to
technical functions of the DNS. ICANN should not be regulating market activity.
\par }\pard \s16\ql
\li0\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6107023
{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023
Notwithstanding the above, the RC is in near unanimous agreement that
sun-setting the Add Gr
ace Period (AGP) is not an appropriate action should the GNSO decide to address
Tasting activity. Many Registrars who do not participate in Tasting use the AGP
in various ways not related to Tasting, as detailed in section 4.4 of the
Outcomes Report of th
e GNSO Ad Hoc Group on Domain Name Tasting. Report found here:
\par }{\field\fldedit{\*\fldinst {\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023
HYPERLINK
"http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-domain-tasting-adhoc-outcomes-report-final.pdf"
\\o
"http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-domain-tasting-adhoc-outcomes-report-final.pdf"
}{
\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid12018373\charrsid12018373 {\*\datafield
10d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b0200000003000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90bba00000068007400740070003a002f002f0067006e0073006f002e006900630061006e006e002e006f00720067002f006400720061006600740073002f0067006e0073006f002d0064006f006d00610069006e002d00
740061007300740069006e0067002d006100640068006f0063002d006f007500740063006f006d00650073002d007200650070006f00720074002d00660069006e0061006c002e007000640066000000795881f43b1d7f48af2c825dc485276300000000a5ab0000}}}{\fldrslt
{
\cs15\ul\cf2\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023
http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-domain-tasting-adhoc-outcomes-report-final.pdf}}}{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023
\par Sun-setting the AGP would unnecessarily put additional burdens and costs
on Registrars and Registrants using the AGP for these non-Tasting reasons.
\par To the extent that the GNSO should decide to recommend policy or actions
with the intent of curbing or eliminating Tasting activity, RC members are in
general agreement that:
\par }\pard \s16\ql
\li720\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin720\itap0\pararsid6107023
{\b\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023\charrsid6107023 Preferred
}{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023 \endash
The GNSO should recommend that ICANN make the transactional fee component of
the variable Registrar fee
s apply to all new registrations except for a reasonable number that are
deleted within the AGP. Implementation time for Registrars would be negligible.
\par }{\b\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023\charrsid6107023 Acceptable
but not preferred}{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023 \endash The GNSO
should encourage gTLD Registries to only allow AGP refunds on
a reasonable number of new registrations, noting that such action is affective
only if all gTLD registries apply it, and do so in a reasonably consistent
manner. Implementation time for Registrars could be substantial depending on
how each Registry decide
d to define their policy. If Registrars need to modify their systems and/or
services a minimum of 90-days advance notice should be given.
\par }\pard \s16\ql
\li0\ri0\sb100\sa100\sbauto1\saauto1\widctlpar\aspalpha\aspnum\faauto\adjustright\rin0\lin0\itap0\pararsid6107023
{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid6107023
Note that neither of the above actions requires new policy or modifications to
existing policy. Therefore the RC, regardless of their view, is generally
opposed to a PDP on this issue.
\par }{\lang9\langfe1033\langnp9\insrsid2248791
\par }}
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|