Re: [council] Fwd: ccNSO response to GNSO resolution

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

Personally, the more I think about it, the more I think it might be  
sufficient to inform Bart Boswnkle, the staff member responsible the  
issues report  of when we believe our response to the Board will be  
available so that he can figure this in, as he wishes, to his work and  
his schedule.
The report  we are working on is not specifically meant as an input  
for the ccNSO PDP but as a response to the Board, and I wonder about  
the wisdom of having it stand in the role of comment to the ccNSO  
PDP.  The GNSO Council could certainly submit something specific in  
comment if we thought that was appropriate, though it may be more  
effective for various members and constituencies to do so  
individually  at this point.  Once we are ready with the response to  
the Board, we certainly can make a copy available to Bart.
Further, as I do not believe we will be ready until the meeting on 13  
Feb, I think it would be asking a lot to ask him to wait for our  
input.  Of course the sooner we publish a draft, the sooner people  
will have an idea of the direction of the response.  That in itself  
may be helpful.
a.



On 21 Jan 2008, at 23:27, Gomes, Chuck wrote:

> > I can do so if the council desires.  I have, however, sent in my own
> > personal response to the ccNSO comment site (mailed before I
> > received the ccNSO letter), and would suggest that as co-chair of
> > the council and chair of the group writing the response that you
> > might be the better source of this respectful request.  But, I am
> > wiling to do so if the council so choses.
> I would be more than happy to do this (as vice chair) if the Council  
> is
> supportive of that idea.  I think it is less important who sends it  
> than
> it is that it be sent before the end of the public comment period,  
> which
> is this coming Friday, 25 January.