RE: [council] Whois study suggetsions

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

I had a suspicion that may be the case.  Definitely agree with getting it 
online, but Tom raises a valid point.   Is there an easy workaround (separate 
name/affiliation from contact information and disclose one but suppress the 
other)?  

 

-----Original Message-----
From: liz.gasster [mailto:liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 5:03 PM
To: Rosette, Kristina; 'Thomas Keller'
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Whois study suggetsions

Thanks Kristina.  Apparently that redaction feature is a straightforward 
algorithm in email but is more complex to employ to delete partial portions of 
text in an on-line form.  I'm sure it could be mastered nonetheless.  I was 
excited to get the online form working given time deadlines and opted for 
prudence and expediency.  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 1:29 PM
To: liz.gasster@xxxxxxxxx; Thomas Keller
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Whois study suggetsions


Steve DelBianco submitted them on behalf of NetChoice.  He gave me permission 
to REVEAL and asked that I let you all know he is happy to answer any questions 
anyone may have about the study proposals.  

Liz, I know that some - but not all - of my contact information is redacted 
when I post to the Council list from my Blackberry (which has that pesky 
automatic e-signature).  Perhaps the method used there could be cross applied 
here?



 

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of liz.gasster
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:13 PM
To: 'Thomas Keller'
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Whois study suggetsions


Hi Tom,

Yes, I take your overall point!  As to the details of how this came about, the 
answer has more of a technical reason, not so much a policy rationale.
I wanted to solicit full reach information (which is not usually the case for 
public comments) so that I could follow up and ask clarifying questions if need 
be, without revealing all info to the world, but couldn't separate the "name 
and affiliation" from the reach info, so we opted to blank out all from the 
public view.  

I guess I'll operate like an OPOC in this case...I will RELAY but not REVEAL!

Liz

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Thomas Keller
Sent: Friday, January 11, 2008 12:50 AM
To: 'GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx'; 'Council GNSO'
Subject: AW: [council] Whois study suggetsions


Hello,

What strikes me as very strange is that everyone who registeres a domain name 
in the gTLD world will be held out to the public but persons/groups that 
suggest further studies on this issue are

Submitted By:
[Redacted for privacy reasons]

protected.

Best,

tom

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Im 
Auftrag von GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2008 19:52
An: 'Council GNSO'
Betreff: [council] Whois study suggetsions


Dear Council members,

The 3 study suggestion responses to topics of study on WHOIS may be directly 
viewed at:

http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/msg00001.html
http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/msg00002.html
http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/msg00003.html

These are published on page:
http://www.icann.org/public_comment/
and by clicking on the link at the bottom of the text marked [comments], 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/whois-comments-2008/
the studies may be seen along with any comments that may be submitted.

Let me know if you have any questions.
Thanks you.
Kind regards,

Glen

--
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
http://gnso.icann.org