<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Issue for IDN discussion
- To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Issue for IDN discussion
- From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 14:46:54 -0800
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Hi,
In addition to the general issue I brought up in an earlier message
about the basic presumptions over general name space and its (re-)
allocation, i would like to offer a starting question for discussion:
To what extent is there support within the council for the allocation
of at most 1 IDN in 1 Script per 3166-1 based ccTLD by methods chosen
by the IDNC fast track WG, so long as it is clearly understood that
no other allocations may be made until such time as there is a
community wide discussion and agreement of any further re-allocation
of gNSO namespace to the ccNSO?
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|