<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] New mailing lists eg IDN
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] New mailing lists eg IDN
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 12:28:07 -0500
- In-reply-to: <30D5E57F-A20E-4A7D-9A13-9314596DF2AA@psg.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acg1xZTolKE3SqiKRNelQv1K15EbKwADDxFw
- Thread-topic: [council] New mailing lists eg IDN
It would be easy enough to invite the members of the old list to join a
new list.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Monday, December 03, 2007 10:57 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] New mailing lists eg IDN
>
>
> hi,
>
> I do not see why using a well established list and giving it
> a new/ continuing purpose is unprofessional.
>
> A reason for suggesting it is that this list proved itself
> capable of civilised and productive working methods with
> minor exceptions and his list already includes much of the
> ICANN skill set on these IDN issues. This list is also
> composed of people who have shown themselves to be interested
> in the issues and capable of working on the issues. So it
> seemed like a possible solution that save everyone a bit of
> work in terms of building a new list. In a sense we are
> continuing to discuss the same issues that this group of
> people worked on, and it seems reasonable to continue that
> list as opposed to designing a new wheel.
>
> However, if the council thinks that creating a new list is a
> better proposal that too would be a professional approach.
>
> a.
>
>
>
> On 3 dec 2007, at 00.56, Philip Sheppard wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Can we be a little more professional please ?
> >
> > The existence of a past mail listing is mostly irrelevant
> to a future
> > one.
> > Setting up a new list is trivially easy.
> >
> > Step 1
> > Identify need / purpose / audience / timeline
> >
> > Step 2
> > Specify rules if any
> >
> > Step 3
> > Invite proposed audience to opt in.
> >
> > Philip
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|