<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Funding for travel
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Funding for travel
- From: Ute Decker <udecker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 11:09:14 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Acceptlanguage: en-US
- In-reply-to: <001401c8359b$8c911320$e601a8c0@PSEVO>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <001401c8359b$8c911320$e601a8c0@PSEVO>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acg1m4yAWmUsST/STlC4YOP6VmC0AwAAOftw
- Thread-topic: [council] Funding for travel
I very much support that - ideally giving him also an idea of scale. I am
among the many who will not be able to attend unless travel cost is covered and
this is too important a meeting to miss out on.
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Philip Sheppard
Sent: 03 December 2007 10:59
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Funding for travel
Given that Delhi will soon be upon us, and that Council travel funding is in
the ICANN budget, (even though we have repeated this request in our reform
submission), should we consider a direct request to the ICANN CEO to authorise
release of funds for Delhi ?
Philip
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|