[council] FW: [REGYCON] IPC Proposed Revised IGO DRP

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Olof,
 
Here is David's response to your query.
 
Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

________________________________

From: GNSO Registry Constituency Planning [mailto:REGYCON-L@NIC.MUSEUM]
On Behalf Of David W. Maher
Sent: Friday, November 30, 2007 11:39 AM
To: REGYCON-L@NIC.MUSEUM
Subject: [REGYCON] IPC Proposed Revised IGO DRP


Olof:
Chuck Gomes asked me to reply to your question:
about the inner meaning of what you call the "treaty route". Would that
imply
a) all IGOs do like the Red Cross and nail the name protection in their
respective treaties
or
b) some overarching treaty for all IGOs clarifying name protection for
them all, a kind of "Paris Convention +"
or
c) something else?

The answer is all of the above. The "treaty route" is the way nations to
protect their national interests and the jurisdiction of their courts.  
David
David W. Maher                    
Senior Vice President - Law & Policy    
Public Interest Registry                     
1775 Wiehle Ave, #102A
Reston, VA 20190  USA
(v) +1-312-876-8055              
(f)  +1-312-876-7934    
http://www.pir.org

<http://www.pir.org/> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTE:
This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may be protected by
legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, be aware that
any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this e-mail or any
attachment is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error,
please notify us immediately by returning it to the sender and deleting
this copy from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.