RE: [council] Updated GNSO Council agenda 2O November 2007 - IGO DRP

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

In my role as one RyC representative to the Council and not in my role as Vice 
Chair, I second this motion.  As required by the RyC Articles of Operation, 
Edmon, Jordi and I will need time to vet the forthcoming ideas from the IPC 
wihtin the RyC.

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it 
is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and 
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, 
distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this 
message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the 
original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Rosette, Kristina
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 9:22 PM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: RE: [council] Updated GNSO Council agenda 2O 
> November 2007 - IGO DRP
> 
> 
> All,
> 
> Since our October 31 meeting, there has been additional 
> discussion within the IPC regarding the IGO-DRP that has 
> culminated in two developments relevant to the discussion 
> tomorrow.  First, the IPC is drafting a revised proposed DRP 
> that we hope will satisfactorily address many of the 
> objections articulated thus far.  Having a revised proposed 
> DRP that addresses these objections will, in our view, 
> provide a better basis for deciding whether to proceed with a 
> PDP.  We expect to circulate the revised proposed DRP not 
> later than COB (Pacific) next Wednesday, 28 November.  
> Second, as a consequence of this decision, the IPC no longer 
> intends to pursue - either formally or informally - the 
> working group concept set out in the motion I proposed in LA.
> 
> In light of the expected revised proposed DRP and to ensure 
> that all constituencies have sufficient time for review and 
> consultation, I propose that we postpone voting on the PDP 
> until our December 20 meeting.  Accordingly, set forth below 
> is a motion to that effect.  
> 
> -*-
> 
> Whereas, the Council has previously requested and received 
> both the 15 June 2007 "GNSO Issues Report on Dispute Handling 
> for IGO Names and Abbreviations" and the 28 September 2007 
> "Staff Report on Draft IGO Domain Name Dispute Resolution Procedure;"
> and
> 
> Whereas, the Council believes that further work on the draft 
> IGO Domain Name Dispute Resolution Procedure is appropriate 
> before voting on whether to initiate a policy development 
> process on this issue; and
> 
> Whereas, the Intellectual Property Constituency is drafting 
> and expects to distribute not later than 28 November a 
> revised proposed draft dispute resolution procedure,
> 
> Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Council postpones 
> until its 20 December meeting the vote on whether to initiate 
> a policy development process.
> 
> -*-
> 
> Kristina 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 4:09 PM
> To: 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: [council] Updated GNSO Council agenda 2O November 2007
> 
> 
> Dear Council Members,
> 
> Please find the updated agenda for the call tomorrow:
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-20nov07.shtml
> 
> The updates are as follows:
> Item 3: Intergovernmental Organization Dispute Resolution Process
> (IGO-DRP) vote (15)
> Vote on PDP is pending from 31 Oct. as we did not take a vote 
> to specifically delay the PDP vote until after the ad-hoc 
> group being led by the IPC reported back.
> 
> Item 4: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy PDP vote (15) 4a - 
> Vote to initiate PDP pending from 31 Oct 4b - Contingent vote 
> of forming a TF for the PDP pending from 31 Oct.
> 
> 5a. Discussion of Board Motion of Interim solution WG
> see:
> Adopted Board Resolutions Los Angeles
> http://www.icann.org/minutes/resolutions-02nov07.htm#_Toc55609363
> Update on Internationalized Domain Names Charter IDNC Working 
> Group http://www.ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idnc-charter.htm
> 
> Item 8: Letter on behalf of Hagen Hultzsch re job description 
> for open GNSO Council position in 2008 
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04100.html
> 
> Decision on how to proceed
> 
> Item 10: AOB
> 10 a. Discussion of chair and vice-chair election process
> 
> 
> Agenda
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/agenda-20nov07.shtml
> Agenda approval
> 
> Item 0: Roll call of Council members
> 
> Item 1: Update any statements of interest
> 
> Item 2: Approval of the draft GNSO Council minutes of 11 
> October 2007 - (agenda, Items 0 -2 15 mins) 
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04014.html
> 
> Item 3: Intergovernmental Organization Dispute Resolution Process
> (IGO-DRP) vote (15)
> 
> Vote on PDP is pending from 31 Oct. as we did not take a vote 
> to specifically delay the PDP vote until after the ad-hoc 
> group being led by the IPC reported back.
> 
> Intergovernmental Organization Dispute Resolution Process 
> (IGO-DRP) developed by staff:
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/gnso-igo-drp-report-v2-28sep07.pdf
> 
> Motion that failed in LA
> Whereas, the Council has previously requested and received 
> both the 15 June 2007 "GNSO Issues Report on Dispute Handling 
> for IGO Names and Abbreviations"
> and the 28 September 2007 "Staff Report on Draft IGO Domain 
> Name Dispute Resolution Procedure;"
> and
> 
> Whereas, the Council believes that further work on the draft 
> IGO Domain Name Dispute Resolution Procedure is appropriate 
> before voting on whether to initiate a policy development 
> process on this issue; and
> 
> Whereas, the Intellectual Property Constituency is willing to 
> lead a small ad hoc group to review and consider a proposed 
> draft dispute resolution procedure,
> 
> Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Council authorizes 
> the creation of a small ad hoc group of interested informed 
> and representative stakeholders and members of the GAC to 
> review, consider and propose as appropriate revisions to the 
> Draft IGO Domain Name Dispute Resolution Procedure set forth 
> in the Staff Report, and instructs the ad hoc group to report 
> to the Council with its recommendations not later than 15 
> February 2008.
> 
> Item 4: Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy PDP vote (15)
> 
> 4a - Vote to initiate PDP pending from 31 Oct 4b - Contingent 
> vote of forming a TF for the PDP pending from 31 Oct.
> 
> Meeting transcript from L.A.:
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/transcripts-gnso-council-transf
> ers27oct07.pdf
> 
> Issues Report:
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/transfers/issues-report-transfer-
> denial-clarifications-19oct07.pdf
> 
> In the second URL above, especially note Section 2.2.e, staff 
> recommendation for a PDP and Section 5, DISCUSSION OF 
> POSSIBLE POLICY OUTCOMES
> 
> Item 5: IDN ccTLD WG Discussion (15)
> 
> 5a. Discussion of Board Motion of Interim solution WG
> see:
> Adopted Board Resolutions Los Angeles
> http://www.icann.org/minutes/resolutions-02nov07.htm#_Toc55609363
> Update on Internationalized Domain Names
> 
> Charter IDNC Working Group
> http://www.ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/idnc-charter.htm
> 
> Draft GNSO comments revised in L.A:
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/ccnso-gac-issues-paper-idn-ccs-dr
> aft-gnso-comments-wg-rev-28oct07.pdf
> 
> Item 6: GNSO response to BGC WG on GNSO Improvements (30) 
> Draft Report of the BGC on GNSO Improvements 
> http://icann.org/topics/gnso-improvements/gnso-improvements-re
> port-15oct07.pdf
> 
> Item 7: Establishment of a general GNSO discussion list, 
> similar to the ones for NANOG and IETF. (15)
> 
> Item 8: Letter on behalf of Hagen Hultzsch re job description 
> for open GNSO Council position in 2008 
> http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg04100.html
> 
> Decision on how to proceed
> 
> Item 9: Pending Work Item Review (10)
> http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/pending-action-list.pdf
> 
> (Link to Pending Work Item Review is permanently displayed on page:
> http://gnso.icann.org/ below 'Master Calendar')
> 
> Item 10: AOB
> 10 a. Discussion of chair and vice-chair election process
> 
> (13:00 Los Angeles, 16:00 Washington DC, 21:00 London, 22:00 
> Brussels, 08:00 Melbourne, next day)
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> Local time between October and March, Winter in the NORTHERN 
> hemisphere
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 21:00
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> California, USA (PST) UTC-8-0DST 13:00
> New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-5+0DST 16:00 Rio de 
> Janeiro, Brazil UTC-2+1DST 19:00 Buenos Aires, Argentina 
> UTC-3+0DST 18:00 London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 21:00 
> Brussels, Belgium (CEST) UTC+1+0DST 22:00 Karlsruhe, Germany 
> (CEST) UTC+1+0DST 22:00 Barcelona, Spain (CEST) UTC+1+0DST 
> 22:00 Oslo, Norway (CEST) UTC+1+0DST 22:00 Amman, Jordan 
> UTC+2+0DST 23:00 Phnom Penh, Cambodia UTC+7+0DST 04:00 Hong 
> Kong, China UTC+8+0DST 05:00 Singapore, Singapore UTC+8+0DST 
> 05:00 Melbourne, Australia (EST) UTC+10+1DST 08:00 (next day)
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> --------------
> The DST starts/ends on last Sunday of March 2008, 2:00 or 
> 3:00 local time (with exceptions)
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com
> 
> Let me know if you have any questions.
> Thank you.
> kind regards.
> 
> Glen
> --
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
> gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
> 
> 
>