ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] Issues Report on specified Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy issues

  • To: "Karen Lentz" <karen.lentz@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] Issues Report on specified Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy issues
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2007 11:42:55 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <003e01c81273$a68f3040$a22700c0@ICANN3D196AD77F>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcgSc6Y7I1mMdRNmSlWsFe2OL8YKyQDFyFSA
  • Thread-topic: [council] Issues Report on specified Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy issues

Why does the issues paper on the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy only
focus on four issues discussed in the WG report?  If we are going to
improve the policy, is there any reason why we shouldn't attempt to
address all of the issues identified in the WG report?

I suppose that it could be easier to deal with four very specific issues
in one PDP and then initiate another PDP for the remaining issues.  It
might be useful to have the planning group focus on this.

Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Karen Lentz
> Sent: Friday, October 19, 2007 1:16 PM
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [council] Issues Report on specified Inter-Registrar 
> Transfer Policy issues
> Dear All,
> Attached is the Issues Report requested by the Council at its 
> meeting on 20 September 
> (http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/minutes-gnso-20sep07.shtml),
> covering a limited set of clarifications to the 
> Inter-Registrar Transfer
> Policy:
> "ii) Pursuant to section 1.b of Annex A of ICANN's Bylaws, 
> that the GNSO Council initiate the formal GNSO Policy 
> Development Process by requesting the creation of an issues 
> report evaluating issues raised by the working group document 
> "Points of Clarification Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (see 
> http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/Transfer-Denial-Clarifications-23
> aug07.pdf)."
> I am happy to answer any questions on the report.
> Best regards,
> Karen
> -
> Karen Lentz
> gTLD Registry Liaison, ICANN
> 4676 Admiralty Way, No. 330
> Marina del Rey, CA  90292
> +1 310 301 5836 office
> +1 310 895 3637 mobile
> karen.lentz@xxxxxxxxx

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>