RE: [council] Considering the work of the Tasting Group

["Rosette, Kristina" <krosette@xxxxxxx>]

Ross,

You mentioned a short time ago that there were three steps the Council
could take now with regard to tasting.  Would you please post them?  I
think I know two of them, but it would be helpful to know for sure.

Thanks.

Kristina  

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Ross Rader
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2007 10:47 PM
Cc: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Considering the work of the Tasting Group


What is the status of this request? I am not prepared to vote on a
motion regarding this work until I can consider the report with the
benefit of these answers.

It does not make sense for us to consider developing new policy if we
have existing terms on the books that can otherwise deal with the
behaviors we are concerned with.

Ross Rader wrote:
> 
> Avri -
> 
> In order to properly consider the forthcoming recommendations of the 
> working group on tasting, I would like to get some further data from 
> staff as background information.
> 
> Specifically, I would like to understand staff experience in enforcing

> clause 3.74 of the Registrar Accreditation Agreement.
> 
> a) How many enforcement cases have been opened related to this clause 
> in the last 5 years?
> b) How were these cases resolved? (identifying information is not 
> necessary, but specifics would be useful)
> c) Does staff view 3.7.4 as an effective hedge against abuse of the 
> AGP, if so, why? If not, why not?
> 
> Would it be possible for you to pass this request along to staff? My 
> instinct tells me that this is more of an enforcement failure than it 
> is a policy failure and I'd like to understand this better before I 
> vote on initiating a PDP.
> 


--
Regards,

Ross Rader
Director, Retail Services
Tucows Inc.

http://www.domaindirect.com
t. 416.538.5492