ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Proposed Resolution re Domain Tasting

  • To: "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Proposed Resolution re Domain Tasting
  • From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <mxrodenbaugh@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 17:40:04 -0700
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Received:X-YMail-OSG:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language; b=BtVyQyaMzd/T8IYZeEOyzID53XenxO9+viEhWgDSSL3emP4IDnTrSUpDL6ZUV5jRxqed0EiLFaEKCL1SxQjMkBX+uJPlavWvwoyc1ma1rRV3S1ZyZai37Ezmjme9w/cE9Jnrt8JoetI1pBVOjhLgTToT+hHpiq7tbj7R0d7E02E= ;
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcgKDOzOKcm43VirS/2s/FnSrNXzlQ==
I offer the following draft resolution, taken from the Final Outcomes Report
of the ad hoc group:

 

Whereas, the GNSO Council acknowledges the Final Outcomes Report of the ad
hoc group on Domain Tasting, the Council hereby initiates a Policy
Development Process, and commissions a duly constituted Working Group with
the following Terms of Reference:

 

1. Review and assess all the effects of domain tasting activities that have
been identified. 

 

2. Judge whether the overall effects justify measures to be taken to impede
domain tasting.

 

3. If the answer to 2 is affirmative, then consider the likely impacts upon
the Constituencies of various potential measures, and recommend measures
designed to impede domain tasting.

 

This Working Group shall report back to Council by January 24, 2008.

 

I am sure this needs additional language about PDPs, at least, but thought
this would be a good start for discussion.

 

Kind regards,

 

Mike Rodenbaugh
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>