<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Fwd: Update on ccNSO actions re IDNs
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Fwd: Update on ccNSO actions re IDNs
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 09:55:46 -0400
- In-reply-to: <57C7144A-A236-4EF0-8464-53FD913E1A24@psg.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcgGaqLbANXD83S1TtG7MWdr3ed6GgAIv6FQ
- Thread-topic: [council] Fwd: Update on ccNSO actions re IDNs
Thanks Avri.
Did Chris indicate whether these resolutions were already passed by the
ccNSO or were under consideration. If the former, I find it curious
that the first resolution in the 1st attached file asks for an issues
report to examine whether a PDP should be initiated and the third
resolution seems to assume a PDP will happen.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2007 5:35 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] Fwd: Update on ccNSO actions re IDNs
>
> Hi,
>
> As part of our efforts to co-operate on IDN ccTLD planning, I
> received the following from Chris Disspain, chair of the
> ccNSO, and have permission to pass them on to the council.
>
> a.
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|