<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Motions under AOB for council meeting September 6 2007
Hi,
Glen will be sending out the official text shortly.
I would like to work something out for motions in the future.
I think I may try to use one of those collaborative work environments
like
docs.google.com or some such that allows anyone who wants to see a
document
as it is being edited. I will look into it.
I too have felt that as we work to improve and amend a motion on the
call
people lose track of some of the wording changes. I know I am having
a hard enough making the changes in my version and then reading it out.
Using one of these environments anyone who was on the net could see the
changes as they were made.
thanks
a.
On 6 sep 2007, at 17.31, Thomas Keller wrote:
I have to admit that I'm not sure what we will be voting on anymore.
Could someone please
send all motions that are going to be tabled on todays call to this
list
(whois only).
Thanks,
tom
Gomes, Chuck schrieb:
And Ross's motion as well?
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Rodenbaugh [mailto:mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 10:08 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck; Avri Doria; GNSO Council
Subject: RE: [council] Motions under AOB for council meeting
September 6 2007
It is an attempt to capture the key portions of Avri's and
the BC motion.
Mike Rodenbaugh
Sr. Legal Director
Yahoo! Inc.
NOTE: This message may be protected by attorney-client
and/or work product privileges, if you are not the intended
recipient then please delete this message and all attachments
and notify me as soon as possible. Thanks.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Gomes, Chuck
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 6:52 AM
To: Avri Doria; GNSO Council
Subject: RE: [council] Motions under AOB for council meeting
September 6
2007
Am I correct in concluding that the BC compromise motion is
an attempt to consolidate the key elements of all the
motions? If so, that is an important consideration as we
discuss the motions today.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or
entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential and exempt from disclosure
under applicable law. Any unauthorized use, distribution, or
disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, please notify sender immediately and
destroy/delete the original transmission."
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2007 3:14 AM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Motions under AOB for council
meeting September
6 2007
Hi,
On consideration I will accept your proposal as a friendly
amendment
as stated below.
I have also accepted Chuck's friendly amendment on your friendly
amendment as well.
It is also my assumption that Ross' proposed amendment
remains on the
table and will be voted on before the motion as amended.
I must note that my original motion was never properly seconded.
Does anyone second this motion?
The proposed amendment, has however, been seconded.
I am assuming that now both the original Mike Rodenbough
(BCUC) motion and the counter motion by Ross Rader are now off the
table.
thanks
----------------------
Proposed motion to finish Whois work as amended by Mike
Rodenbaugh for
vote on Sept 06, 2007
Whereas;
1. The Whois WG has now completed its work,
Therefore;
Be it resolved, that the GNSO Council;
The GNSO Council accepts the WG report and appreciates the efforts
made by WG participants and ICANN staff in preparing this report.
Further, the GNSO council
also:
a) graciously thanks all of the volunteers, consultants, staff and
others who
have participated in the Task Force and Working Group.
b) makes no specific policy recommendation to the ICANN
board at this
time
concerning Whois or related policy.
c) requests ICANN Staff to proceed with a study of the factual
characteristics
of the Whois database, as suggested by the GAC and by
the Working
Group report.
This study should include a review and analysis of the
different
proxy services
available today, a summary of any other statistical
studies that
Staff can locate,
and ideally should be completed by October 4, 2007.
d) requests an update on the WHOIS Data Accuracy Program
outlined by
ICANN Staff on
April 27th, including any statistical information that can be
summarized thus far.
See http://www.icann.org/whois/whois-data-accuracy-
program-27apr07.pdf.
d) shall review any additional factual information, in conjunction
with the
policy suggestions from the Task Force and Working
Group reports,
complete this
work on Whois, and make a report to the ICANN community
and to the
ICANN Board,
as follows:
1 - Staff will produce a Draft Final Report that references the TF
report, the WG
charter and the WG report by and which includes an overall
description of the
process by September 13. This overview should include
the text
of motions to
be voted on at the end of this process.
2 - This report will be sent out for Constituency Statement
Review on
September 13.
Constituencies will be asked to follow the by-laws on
constituency statements.
Specifically :
1. Constituency Statements.
The Representatives will each be responsible for
soliciting
the position of their constituencies, at a minimum, and
other
comments as each Representative deems
appropriate, regarding
the issue under consideration. This position and other
comments,
as applicable, should be submitted in a formal
statement to
the
task force chair (each, a "Constituency
Statement") within
thirty-five
(35) calendar days after initiation of the PDP.
Every Constituency Statement shall include at least the
following:
(i) If a Supermajority Vote was reached, a clear
statement
of the
constituency's position on the issue;
(ii) If a Supermajority Vote was not reached, a clear
statement of all
positions espoused by constituency members;
(iii) A clear statement of how the constituency
arrived at
its position(s).
Specifically, the statement should detail specific
constituency meetings,
teleconferences, or other means of deliberating an
issue, and a list of
all members who participated or otherwise submitted
their views;
(iv) An analysis of how the issue would affect the
constituency, including
any financial impact on the constituency; and
(v) An analysis of the period of time that would
likely be
necessary to
implement the policy.
**Final Date for for updated constituency statement:
October 4, 2007
3 - Staff will Incorporate Constituency comments and any additional
factual information
into Final Report by October 11, 2007
4 - Staff is requested to produce staff implementation notes by
October 15
5 - Community Public Comment on Final Report: October 15 -
November 6,
2007
6 - A Public and Council Discussion will be held during the
LA Public
Meeting
7 - Final vote on first GNSO Council meeting after November 6, 2007
On 6 sep 2007, at 02.09, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:
The BC also had a motion pending, seconded by the IPC. We will
rescind that motion in favor of this compromise motion that
incorporates BC, IPC and GAC request for an additional
factual study,
and requests updates on ongoing ICANN studies, to
incorporate that
information into the process suggested by Avri's motion.
Please see attached. I am not sure if Avri would consider this a
friendly amendment to her motion. But otherwise we suggest
it as an
alternative.
Kind regards,
Mike Rodenbaugh
Sr. Legal Director
Yahoo! Inc.
NOTE: This message may be protected by attorney-client
and/or work
product privileges, if you are not the intended recipient
then please
delete this message and all attachments and notify me as soon as
possible. Thanks.
...
Proposed Amendment From Ross Rader to the Whois end
process motion:
- that "November 6, 2007" in step 5 be replaced with "October 31,
2007"
- that "after November 6, 2007" in step 7 be replaced with
"during the
LA Public Meeting".
<BC Compromise Resolution - 2.doc>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|