Re: [council] Motions under AOB for council meeting September 6 2007

[Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>]

Hi,

On consideration I will accept your proposal as a friendly amendment  
as stated below.
I have also accepted Chuck's friendly amendment on your friendly  
amendment as well.
It is also my assumption that Ross' proposed amendment remains on the  
table and will
be voted on before the motion as amended.

I must note that my original motion was never properly seconded.

Does anyone second this motion?
The proposed amendment, has however, been seconded.

I am assuming that now both the original Mike Rodenbough (BCUC)  
motion and the
counter motion by Ross Rader are now off the table.

thanks

----------------------

Proposed motion to finish Whois work as amended by Mike Rodenbaugh  
for vote on Sept 06, 2007

Whereas;

1.    The Whois WG has now completed its work,

Therefore;

Be it resolved, that the GNSO Council;

The GNSO Council accepts the WG report and appreciates the efforts  
made by WG
participants and ICANN staff in preparing this report.  Further, the  
GNSO council
also:

a) graciously thanks all of the volunteers, consultants, staff and  
others who
   have participated in the Task Force and Working Group.

b) makes no specific policy recommendation to the ICANN board at this  
time
   concerning Whois or related policy.

c) requests ICANN Staff to proceed with a study of the factual  
characteristics
   of the Whois database, as suggested by the GAC and by the Working  
Group report.
   This study should include a review and analysis of the different  
proxy services
   available today, a summary of any other statistical studies that  
Staff can locate,
   and ideally should be completed by October 4, 2007.

d) requests an update on the WHOIS Data Accuracy Program outlined by  
ICANN Staff on
   April 27th, including any statistical information that can be  
summarized thus far.
   See http://www.icann.org/whois/whois-data-accuracy- 
program-27apr07.pdf.
d) shall review any additional factual information, in conjunction  
with the
   policy suggestions from the Task Force and Working Group reports,  
complete this
   work on Whois, and make a report to the ICANN community and to  
the ICANN Board,
   as follows:

1 - Staff will produce a Draft Final Report that references the TF  
report, the WG
    charter and the WG report by and which includes an overall  
description of the
    process by September 13.  This overview should include the text  
of motions to
    be voted on at the end of this process.

2 - This report will be sent out for Constituency Statement Review on  
September 13.
     Constituencies will be asked to follow the by-laws on  
constituency statements.
     Specifically :
         1. Constituency Statements.
         The Representatives will each be responsible for soliciting
         the position of their constituencies, at a minimum, and other
         comments as each Representative deems appropriate, regarding
         the issue under consideration.  This position and other  
comments,
         as applicable, should be submitted in a formal statement to  
the
         task force chair (each, a "Constituency Statement") within  
thirty-five
         (35) calendar days after initiation of the PDP.
         Every Constituency Statement shall include at least the
         following:

         (i) If a Supermajority Vote was reached, a clear statement  
of the
             constituency's position on the issue;

         (ii) If a Supermajority Vote was not reached, a clear  
statement of all
              positions espoused by constituency members;

         (iii) A clear statement of how the constituency arrived at  
its position(s).
              Specifically, the statement should detail specific  
constituency meetings,
              teleconferences, or other means of deliberating an  
issue, and a list of
              all members who participated or otherwise submitted  
their views;
         (iv) An analysis of how the issue would affect the  
constituency, including
              any financial impact on the constituency; and

          (v) An analysis of the period of time that would likely be  
necessary to
              implement the policy.

 **Final Date for for updated constituency statement: October 4, 2007

3 - Staff will Incorporate Constituency comments and any additional  
factual information
    into Final Report by October 11, 2007

4 - Staff is requested to produce staff implementation notes by  
October 15
5 - Community Public Comment on Final Report: October 15 - November  
6, 2007
6 - A Public and Council Discussion will be held during the LA Public  
Meeting
7 - Final vote on first GNSO Council meeting after November 6, 2007



On 6 sep 2007, at 02.09, Mike Rodenbaugh wrote:

> The BC also had a motion pending, seconded by the IPC.  We will  
> rescind
> that motion in favor of this compromise motion that incorporates  
> BC, IPC
> and GAC request for an additional factual study, and requests  
> updates on
> ongoing ICANN studies, to incorporate that information into the  
> process
> suggested by Avri's motion.
>
> Please see attached.  I am not sure if Avri would consider this a
> friendly amendment to her motion.  But otherwise we suggest it as an
> alternative.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> Mike Rodenbaugh
>
> Sr. Legal Director
>
> Yahoo! Inc.
>
>
>
> NOTE:  This message may be protected by attorney-client and/or work
> product privileges, if you are not the intended recipient then please
> delete this message and all attachments and notify me as soon as
> possible.  Thanks.

...

> Proposed Amendment From Ross Rader to the Whois end process motion:
>
>
> - that "November 6, 2007" in step 5 be replaced with "October 31,  
> 2007"
> - that "after November 6, 2007" in step 7 be replaced with "during
> the LA Public Meeting".
>
>
> <BC Compromise Resolution - 2.doc>