<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Council meetings and motions
- To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Council meetings and motions
- From: "Mike Rodenbaugh" <mxr@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2007 11:32:00 -0700
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; s=serpent; d=yahoo-inc.com; c=nofws; q=dns; h=received:x-mimeole:content-class:mime-version: content-type:content-transfer-encoding:subject:date:message-id: in-reply-to:x-ms-has-attach:x-ms-tnef-correlator:thread-topic: thread-index:references:from:to:return-path:x-originalarrivaltime; b=GbrKL21Vig2Pg0ZnupAzhwfVZ8Fo9xra49mKbdtxUIMyYXSFYLYzi9jYDVCBNB3v
- In-reply-to: <065A2480-5FD6-4BE7-B392-54999CDC060D@acm.org>
- References: <065A2480-5FD6-4BE7-B392-54999CDC060D@acm.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcfmdBcOkCieUBHMRkC42Z5+Fea1+QACPP9A
- Thread-topic: [council] Council meetings and motions
Agreed, thanks.
Mike Rodenbaugh
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Avri Doria
Sent: Friday, August 24, 2007 10:22 AM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: [council] Council meetings and motions
Hi,
I would like to suggest that, as much as possible, council members
try to float text on the list for motions they would like the council
to vote on at least 48 hours before any meeting. If they relate to
things that are already on the agenda, then I can just bring them up
at the right time. On the other hand if they are not relevant to
topics already on the agenda, they can be considered under AOB.
The agenda will still come out at least a week in advance and having
any motions as early as possible would be best, but at least 2 days
in advance seems helpful.
What do others think?
thanks
a.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|