<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 9 August 2007
- To: "GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 9 August 2007
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 11:03:46 -0400
- In-reply-to: <46BC79FF.10901@gnso.icann.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcfbXeXW6g1XA1ucRt21Fekw3xK5DgAAVOXQ
- Thread-topic: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 9 August 2007
Please note in Resolution 4 that I suggested two edits that are reflected in
the wording below: 1) Change the "and" to "or" so that it reads, "Council
requests the ICANN General Counsel to confirm EITHER that this is possible
under the current by-laws or if not . . . "; 2) add "(s)" to "change" so that
the end of the sentence says, ". . advise what by-law change(s) would be needed
to enable it." Regarding the latter, it may require more than one change in the
Bylaws and I am sure that the Council would want to be made aware of all
possible changes if there are more than one needed.
I believe that the edits I suggested relect the intent of the Council but if
that is not the case please communicate.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to which it
is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any unauthorized use,
distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, please notify sender immediately and destroy/delete the
original transmission."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
> GNSO.SECRETARIAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Sent: Friday, August 10, 2007 10:45 AM
> To: 'Council GNSO'
> Subject: [council] GNSO Council resolutions 9 August 2007
>
> [To: council[at]gnso.icann.org]
>
> Dear Council members,
>
> Ahead of the full minutes, please find the resolutions that
> were passed at the GNSO Council meeting on 9 August 2007.
>
> Resolution 1
> The GNSO Council supports the recommendations, as a whole, as
> set out in the Final Report of the Policies for Contractual
> Conditions Existing Registries, PDP Feb 06 going forward.
> http://gnso.icann.org/issues/gtld-policies/pdp-report-feb06-tf
> r-20Apr07.htm
>
> The motion carried with a supermajority vote as defined in
> the ICANN bylaws, section 16
> http://www.icann.org/general/archive-bylaws/bylaws-28feb06.htm#AnnexA
>
> Vote in favour: Philip Sheppard, Mike Rodenbaugh, Bilal
> Beiram, Ute Decker, Cyril Chua, Tony Harris, Greg Ruth,
> Norbert Klein, Mawaki Chango, Avri Doria (each holding one
> vote), Tom Keller, Adrian Kinderis, Ross Rader (each holding
> 2 votes) Total number of votes in favour 16
>
> Vote against: Chuck Gomes (holding 2 votes) Total number of
> votes against 2
>
> Council members absent who did not vote: Tony Holmes, Robin
> Gross, Cary Karp, Edmon Chung, Jon Bing, Sophia Bekele.
>
>
>
> Resolution 2
> The GNSO Council directs the WHOIS working group to close on 20 August
> 2007 and Council expects to receive the group's Final Report
> on 23 August 2007 for discussion at a GNSO Council meeting on
> 30 August 2007.
>
> Resolution passed unanimously
>
>
> Resolution 3
> The GNSO Council redirects the small ad hoc group on domain
> name tasting to complete its work and deliver its report to
> the Council by 4 October
> 2007 for consideration at the GNSO Council meeting on 11 October 2007.
> In extending the mandate the Council would like to specify
> that 'small'
> in this instance, is defined as, at most 2 representatives
> from among each of the constituencies, the Nominating
> Committee appointees and the Advisory Committees.
>
> Resolution passed unanimously
>
> Resolution 4
> The Council would like to introduce a system of proxy voting.
> Council requests the ICANN General Counsel to confirm EITHER
> that this is possible under the current by-laws or if not
> advise what by-law
> change(s) would be needed to enable it.
> In considering this request the Council asks the ICANN
> General Counsel to consider implications of recusal when
> using a proxy.
>
> Resolution passed unanimously
>
> Let me know if you have any questions or would like any changes made.
> Thank you.
> Kind regards.
>
> Glen
> --
> Glen de Saint Géry
> GNSO Secretariat - ICANN
> gnso.secretariat[at]gnso.icann.org
> http://gnso.icann.org
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|