ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] draft of this morning's slides

  • To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] draft of this morning's slides
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 07:34:22 -0400
  • Importance: high
  • In-reply-to: <DF21ABC0-0F24-40E2-871B-158A3072EEC1@acm.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ace5cgXwq+mM/Cz7R4yPokNYQQrF3AABPjsg
  • Thread-topic: [council] draft of this morning's slides


Isn't our intent to send the Dec05 PDP report to the Board in September,
at which time it will be distributed to the GAC and posted for public
comment.  It my opinion that is critical and think we should say
September instead of October with the anticipation of Board action at
the annual meeting. (Slide 6)  And I think we are trying to finsih by
August with Council action in September.  It is very important that we
set good expectations.

The rest looks fine to me.

Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Avri Doria
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2007 6:45 AM
> To: Council GNSO
> Subject: [council] draft of this morning's slides
> hi,
> please let me know of any issues with these slides.
> i am scheduled to report at around 9:45.
> i will take another editing pass between 8:30 and 9:30.
> thanks
> a.

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>