ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] [Fwd: PDP-Dec05 - staff discussion document]

  • To: "Denise Michel" <denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] [Fwd: PDP-Dec05 - staff discussion document]
  • From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2007 08:49:40 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <4677D859.7000102@icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AceywPFBLmmpbAp4TnGq1oYRiyx51AAd7OXw
  • Thread-topic: [council] [Fwd: PDP-Dec05 - staff discussion document]

Thanks for distributing this Denise.

I look forward for the New gTLD Committee to discuss the staff
discussion points.  It is great to see ongoing progress on
implementation plans.

I was surprised about one staff perception of the challenge processes,
that anyone can challenge a string.  That was not my understanding of
what we as the New gTLD Committee intended.  Did I miss something here?
If that is the case, the NCUC comments in this regard are more on target
than ever.  It may be that the RN-WG recommendations for geographic and
controversial names will help us deal with this.

Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Denise Michel
> Sent: Tuesday, June 19, 2007 9:21 AM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: [council] [Fwd: PDP-Dec05 - staff discussion document]
> Attached is the second ICANN staff implementation team 
> "Discussion Points" document, which addresses the updated 
> work of the New gTLDs Committee on the recommendations for 
> the new top-level domain policy development process.  The 
> purpose of this document, which was developed by ICANN's 
> Services staff, with the support of the Legal and Policy 
> staff, is to provide staff comments to the current set of 
> draft recommendations, with a view toward how each of the 
> recommendations might be implemented. The points listed are 
> to call to the attention of the GNSO some issues it may wish 
> to take into consideration in its remaining discussions.  
> Staff's intent is to support the bottom-up policy development 
> process by ensuring that staff will be able to implement the 
> Committee's final recommendations in a fair, transparent, and 
> non-discriminatory way.
> Regards,
> Denise
> Denise Michel
> Vice President, Policy Development
> ICANN   www.icann.org
> denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>