<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Regarding confusion amongst two letter codes
Hi Chuck
The first was designed to stimulate discussion through a set of
questions which were shared between the two groups. There are
certainly no definitive positions yet although some progress was made
through the IDN session later in the week.
Kind regards.
Liz
.....................................................
Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob
On 06 Apr 2007, at 16:43, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Thanks much Liz. Is the first presentation an official position of
the
ccNSO or of the ccNSO GAC/IDN working group?
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
-----Original Message-----
From: Liz Williams [mailto:liz.williams@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 4:02 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Mike Rodenbaugh; GNSO Council
Subject: Re: [council] Regarding confusion amongst two letter codes
Hello everyone
You may find this information helpful from the ccNSO meeting
in Lisbon.
http://www.icann.org/meetings/lisbon/presentation-ccnso-idn-28
mar07.pdf
Here is the presentation by Elisabeth Portenueve -- http://
www.icann.org/meetings/lisbon/presentation-ccnso-gac-idns-26mar07.pdf
Here is the other presentation by Debbie Garside -- http://
www.icann.org/meetings/lisbon/presentation-garside-26mar07.pdf
Happy Easter.
Liz
.....................................................
Liz Williams
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob
On 05 Apr 2007, at 21:21, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Elisabeth Portenueve is now working for the ISO Maintenance
Agency and
might be a useful resource in this regard.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or
entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is
privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
prohibited.
If you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 3:07 PM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: RE: [council] Regarding confusion amongst two letter codes
Thanks Bruce, so can we ask both the GAC and the ISO Maintenance
Agency?
Also would love to see that research if you have or can recall any
other identifying info so I can find?
Mike Rodenbaugh
Sr. Legal Director
Yahoo! Inc.
-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 6:43 PM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: [council] Regarding confusion amongst two letter codes
Hello Mike,
Furthermore, we note close similarity among many
longstanding ccTLDs
(such as .ai/.al, .am/.an, .bi/.bj, .ch/.cn, .gg/.gq,
.ni/.nl, .to/.tp
and others). Is the GAC aware of any confusion amongst
users of these
ccTLDs?
Actually this could be a good question to ask about the ISO list in
general. Ie did the ISO consider the potential for confusion when
selecting the two letter codes?
Actually I have read some research to indicate that humans
are better
able to distinguish differences in short strings rather than long
strings.
E.g humans can spot the difference between "to" and "tom"
relatively easily, but not necessarily between "licence" and
"license" .
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|