Re: [council] Regarding confusion amongst two letter codes
You may find this information helpful from the ccNSO meeting in Lisbon.
Here is the presentation by Elisabeth Portenueve -- http://
Here is the other presentation by Debbie Garside -- http://
Senior Policy Counselor
ICANN - Brussels
+32 2 234 7874 tel
+32 2 234 7848 fax
+32 497 07 4243 mob
On 05 Apr 2007, at 21:21, Gomes, Chuck wrote:
Elisabeth Portenueve is now working for the ISO Maintenance Agency and
might be a useful resource in this regard.
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Mike Rodenbaugh
Sent: Thursday, April 05, 2007 3:07 PM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: RE: [council] Regarding confusion amongst two letter codes
Thanks Bruce, so can we ask both the GAC and the ISO
Also would love to see that research if you have or can
recall any other identifying info so I can find?
Sr. Legal Director
On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 6:43 PM
To: GNSO Council
Subject: [council] Regarding confusion amongst two letter codes
Furthermore, we note close similarity among many
(such as .ai/.al, .am/.an, .bi/.bj, .ch/.cn, .gg/.gq,
and others). Is the GAC aware of any confusion amongst
users of these
Actually this could be a good question to ask about the ISO list in
general. Ie did the ISO consider the potential for confusion when
selecting the two letter codes?
Actually I have read some research to indicate that humans
are better able to distinguish differences in short strings
rather than long strings.
E.g humans can spot the difference between "to" and "tom"
relatively easily, but not necessarily between "licence" and