<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting - Wednesday 28 March 2007, Lisbon, Portugal
- To: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting - Wednesday 28 March 2007, Lisbon, Portugal
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 08:48:16 -0400
- In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB540421E915@balius.mit>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Acdq24ueX+FV60oNQ5Gy+/nrUArlQwAElIgg
- Thread-topic: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting - Wednesday 28 March 2007, Lisbon, Portugal
Thanks Bruce. This isn't essential in my opinion but it seems like it
would be helpful to have a brief status report of the PRO-WG.
Chuck Gomes
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bruce Tonkin
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 6:36 AM
> To: GNSO Council
> Subject: [council] Draft Agenda for Council meeting -
> Wednesday 28 March 2007, Lisbon, Portugal
>
>
> Draft Agenda for Council meeting - Wednesday 28 March 2007,
> Lisbon, Portugal
>
>
> Item 0: Roll call of Council members present physically or
> available via teleconference
>
> Item 1: Update any statements of interest
>
> Item 2: Approval of Minutes
>
> - 15 March 2007
>
> Item 3: actions arising from input in the GNSO public forum
>
>
> Item 4: WHOIS PDP
>
> - summarise outcome of meeting with the GAC
>
> - next steps - consider forming an implementation working
> group to resolve implementation details of concern to some
> constituencies around OPoC
>
>
> Item 5: Reserved names Working Group
>
> - identify what to include in new gTLDs report, and what
> further work to initiate
>
>
> Item 6: IDN working group
>
> - identify what material to include in new gTLDs report, and
> what will require further work
>
>
> Item 7: new gTLDs PDP
>
> - identify timeline for completion of work
>
>
>
> Item 8: any other business
>
>
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|