Re: [council] Agenda Request for 15 March Council Meeting

[Thomas Keller <tom@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Chuck,

I would strongly support such a meeting.

Best,

tom

Am 11.03.2007 schrieb Gomes, Chuck:
> Mawaki,
> 
> The RN-WG plans to finalize its report in its meeting on 15 March and
> deliver it on 16 March.  My question to the Council for consideration in
> the 15 March Council meeting is the following: would it be useful to
> hold a Dec05 PDP meeting in Lisbon?  I am simply asking that that be
> added to the agenda on the 15 March Council meeting.
> 
> Chuck Gomes
>  
> "This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
> confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
> unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify sender
> immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
>  
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Mawaki Chango [mailto:ki_chango@xxxxxxxxx] 
> > Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2007 5:00 PM
> > To: Gomes, Chuck; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > Subject: Re: [council] Agenda Request for 15 March Council Meeting
> > 
> > Chuck,
> > 
> > Thanks for your diligence in chairing the work on RNs. 
> > Regarding your request as worded, I'm not sure if you mean to 
> > suggest "the review and discussion of the RN-WG report" on 
> > the March 15 call, before the delivery of the report on March 
> > 16 ("The RN-WG plans to send its
> > > report to the Council and the Dec05 PDP committee ... on 16 
> > March,") 
> > > or
> > if you are suggesting to deliver earlier, etc. (and when 
> > would that be?) In addition, I fail to see the benefit of 
> > bringing forward to our next conference call an item that 
> > would request a lot of time (and attention) in a F2F meeting, 
> > as you note, and furthermore in such a short notice. It seems 
> > to me that the discussion can only be ineffective, if 
> > anything (and much more so if it were to take less time on 
> > the call than in Lisbon.)
> > 
> > So I'd rather suggest that we only put on the March 15 agenda 
> > the reception of the RN-WG final report by the council with 
> > brief presentation of the conclusions by the WG chair, etc. 
> > We could have the council discussion of this item either on 
> > another call or in Lisbon.
> > 
> > Mawaki
> >  
> > 
> > --- "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > 
> > > I would like to request that the following item be added to the 
> > > Council meeting on 15 March:  Possible Dec05 PDP meeting in Lisbon?
> > >  
> > > The reason for my request is as follows.  The RN-WG plans 
> > to send its 
> > > report to the Council and the Dec05 PDP committee (Council + 
> > > observers) on 16 March.  It seems like it would be helpful if the 
> > > Dec05 PDP committee reviewed and discuss the report before 
> > the Council 
> > > meeting in Lisbon and then provide any input to the Council.
> > >  
> > > I recognize that the review and discussion of the RN-WG 
> > report could 
> > > also happen in the Council meeting in Lisbon but I think that could 
> > > take up a large portion of the meeting because of the size of the 
> > > report and the large number of recommendations involving eight 
> > > categories of reserved names and many subcategories as well.  I 
> > > believe that the RN-WG report will also be discussed in one of the 
> > > GNSO Public Forums, but again, I would suggest that it may 
> > take more 
> > > time than will be available in one of the forums.
> > >  
> > > I am simply suggesting that we consider this in our meeting on 15 
> > > March and will support whatever the Council decides.
> > >  
> > > Chuck Gomes
> > >  
> > > "This message is intended for the use of the individual or 
> > entity to 
> > > which it is addressed, and may contain information that is 
> > privileged, 
> > > confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any 
> > > unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly 
> > prohibited. 
> > > If you have received this message in error, please notify sender 
> > > immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission."
> > >  
> > > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> 
> 

Gruss,

tom

(__)        
(OO)_____  
(oo)    /|\     A cow is not entirely full of
  | |--/ | *    milk some of it is hamburger!
  w w w  w