ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Regarding dealing with inappropriate behaviour

  • To: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Regarding dealing with inappropriate behaviour
  • From: "Your Name" <harris@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 16:56:32 -0800
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Bruce,

Thanks for this highly welcome comment!

Tony Harris


> Hello Chuck,
> 
> > In that regard, we
> > may want to consider some means of dealing with non-constructive
> > behavior both for observers and members.  
> 
> I tend to agree that a chair should attempt to deal with 
inappropriate
> behaviour, bearing in mind the wishes of the whole group.
> Ie the decision is not made autocratically, but based on documented
> guidelines for acceptable behaviour as well as seeking the views of
> other members of the group.
> 
> I think the Council then is simply able to deal with issues on an 
appeal
> basis - which could be handled in a similar way to that of the Board
> appeal mechanisms - e.g a subgroup of the Council can investigate and
> report to the whole Council.
> 
> However - I would hope that these situations are rare events.  The 
best
> approach is to stop inappropriate behaviour as soon as it happens,
> rather than let it gradually grow amongst multiple participants (ie 
such
> behaviour tends to escalate).  If a problem is let run too long, then
> you will always be blamed for singling out one person, when other 
people
> have also been behaving inappropriately.
> 
> The rough rule of thumb is that was is not acceptable in a small
> face-to-face environment in terms of language and courtesy is not
> acceptable in a telephone conference or mailing list when people are
> further apart.
> 
> I have noticed that when a group of people have been "fighting" 
amongst
> themselves on a mailing list and then meet face-to-face, the bad
> feelings are often carried over.  In contrast where a group has
> initially met face-to-face a few times and the group members have 
built
> some respect for each others opinions and good intentions, then 
mailing
> lists discussions are generally much more civil.   For example, the
> Council meets face-to-face as a group regularly, as do most of the 
more
> active members of the registrar constituency.  Subsequently mailing 
list
> and teleconference discussions tend to be fairly civil despite the 
fact
> that the participants may be strong competitors in business, or have
> strongly opposing views on a matter.
> 
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>