ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Summary of LSE constituency input

  • To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Summary of LSE constituency input
  • From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 04:18:05 +1100
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AcdWloJmAOBBZnV/SRqTpe40RLfqpQADd2KA
  • Thread-topic: Summary of LSE constituency input

Hello All,

I asked the staff to summarise the views of each of the constituencies
on the LSE report.

Each recommendation is ranked in terms of level of support for the
recommendation, and priority for implementing the recommendation.

The rankings are high, medium, low.

This draft table has been prepared based on the inputs to the public
forum.

The recommendations have also been broken into the following categories:

- participation

- rules

- structure

- tools-support

- working procedures

Please review and advise ICANN staff of any corrections.

The purpose of this document will be to help inform the Board Governance
Committee and also form a basis for selecting a few recommendations
(such as recommendation 19) for public discussion in Lisbon.   The aim
is to focus discuss on major structural issues in Lisbon, rather than
debate whether the website could be better.

Regards,
Bruce Tonkin




Attachment: Copy of LSE-Review-clusters constituencies.xls
Description: Copy of LSE-Review-clusters constituencies.xls



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>