RE: [council] Regarding working group membership

["Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

We are learning some things regarding the use of experts in the RN-WG.
One approach that seems to be working well has been having a small group
within the larger group consult with experts and then communicate the
information obtained back to the full group.  Not every issue where
expertise is needed requires consulation by the full WG, but there are
some issues where it will benefit the full group.  Also, there may be
cases where it could be beneficial to have experts as part of the group
and other times where that is not necessary.  Finally, it is not
necessary to always have live consultations with experts; this can save
considerable time.

Chuck Gomes
 
"This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed, and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. Any
unauthorized use, distribution, or disclosure is strictly prohibited. If
you have received this message in error, please notify sender
immediately and destroy/delete the original transmission." 
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of 
> philip.sheppard@xxxxxx
> Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2007 6:23 PM
> To: Bruce Tonkin
> Cc: Council GNSO
> Subject: Re: [council] Regarding working group membership
> 
> A common approach for the inclusion of experts in our WGs 
> seems like a good idea to me.
> 
> Philip
>