<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Question re. ICANN Annual Report
- To: "Denise Michel" <denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Question re. ICANN Annual Report
- From: "Gomes, Chuck" <cgomes@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2007 10:52:26 -0500
- Cc: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <45BCCA8D.6090506@icann.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcdDQipdrbsqEYY4TNyVcCuTZTLVJAAeyoJg
- Thread-topic: [council] Question re. ICANN Annual Report
Thanks Denise. In both cases, it seems to me that some clarification to
a broader audience might be helpful.
Chuck
-----Original Message-----
From: Denise Michel [mailto:denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Sunday, January 28, 2007 11:09 AM
To: Gomes, Chuck
Cc: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Question re. ICANN Annual Report
See my response below**
Regards,
Denise
Denise Michel
Vice President, Policy Development
ICANN www.icann.org
denise.michel@xxxxxxxxx
Gomes, Chuck wrote:
> The second sentence of the 5th paragraph of Paul Twomey's message in
> ICANN's Annual Report (p.9) says, "GNSO and staff are working together
> for the establishment and operation of a new generic top level domain
> (gTLD) program office, to realise the work of the Whois Task Force,
> and to provide input in the development of Internationalised Domain
> Names (IDNs)."
>
> Can anyone tell what is meant by a gTLD program office? Has the GNSO
> been working with staff in this regard?
**This refers to the policy work the GNSO is doing and how GNSO staff is
working with Operations staff to help ensure the necessary policy
guidance is given for successful implementation. The annual report
envisions in the future dedicated staff focused on implementation of the
GNSO's gTLD-related policies ("gTLD program office").
>
> Also, on page 25 in the Policy Support section, the 4th paragraph
> starts out with this sentence: "To consider pre-registration of IDN
> gTLD labels in the first round for new TLDs, the GNSO recently
> launched an IDN Working Group . . ." Is this a misstatement or is it
> true that the IDN working group was launched "to consider
> pre-registration of IDN gTLD labels"?
**This was an effort to capture (at the time the report was drafted) the
GNSO's discussions and activities relating to gTLDs and IDNs. This is
not intended to change the GNSO's IDN Working Group's charter and
workplan.
>
> Chuck
>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|