GNSO Email Archives: [council]

ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Two motions for consideration in the conference call on 20 July 2006

To: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Two motions for consideration in the conference call on 20 July 2006
From: Cary Karp <ck@nic.museum>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2006 11:38:29 +0200
Cc: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB540306752A@balius.mit>
References: <57AD40AED823A7439D25CD09604BFB540306752A@balius.mit>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.4 (X11/20060614)

> (1)  Each Council member that voted in favour of the definition may
> provide a brief explanation of the reason for supporting the resolution
> and their understanding of its meaning.

A Councilor member is a "who" not a "that". Also, "each" was appropriate
to the "must" that has now been changed to "may".

I suggest changing this wording to -

Any Council member who voted ...

/Cary

References:
- [council] Two motions for consideration in the conference call on 20 July 2006
  - From: Bruce Tonkin

<<< Chronological Index >>> <<< Thread Index >>>