<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Proposed WHOIS motion for 20 July 2006
- To: "Council GNSO" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Proposed WHOIS motion for 20 July 2006
- From: "Bruce Tonkin" <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 17:53:25 +1000
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AcamWpRXBDRHVuyOR7aK50OWnOd0RQAv7w9g
- Thread-topic: [council] Proposed WHOIS motion for 20 July 2006
Hello All,
>
> (3) The Council will undertake a dialogue with governments,
> via the GAC, to work towards developing a broadly
> understandable definition of the minimum purposes for which
> the current data required in the Registrar Accreditation
> Agreement (see clause 3.4 of
> http://www.icann.org/registrars/ra-agreement-17may01.htm ), as listed
> below, is collected and retained. The dialogue should seek
> to balance
> privacy and law enforcement concerns with ICANN's mission and
> core values, and must take into account the views of law
> enforcement agencies, data protection authorities, the
> policies and rules of access to ccTLD data, and relevant
> national laws.
An alternative wording for the last sentence is:
The purpose of the dialogue should be to seek, to the extent reasonably
possible, a balance of privacy and law enforcement concerns with ICANN's
mission and core values, and may also consider the views of data
protection authorities, the policies and rules of access to ccTLD data,
and relevant national laws.
Regards,
Bruce Tonkin
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|